InvestorsHub Logo

ssc

Followers 39
Posts 13899
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 12/20/2006

ssc

Re: Hncher post# 30

Wednesday, 11/08/2017 9:39:36 AM

Wednesday, November 08, 2017 9:39:36 AM

Post# of 135
Interesting. While safety and efficacy are important, the much more significant issue is proving that it works. 7 years testing with mice and still not ready to present a case to the FDA to request approval to even begin a human trial. And the human machine is just now in its design stage. There are reasons ibx has fallen to .10

In light of those facts, and considering how many more years to go before human trial would produce approvable results, I question how you arrived at the conclusion that "they shouldn't run out of cash".

Latest report from ibx states $7 million in cash left, burning $1 million/quarter PLUS costs of outsourcing which will include the large tasks of designing and building a human machine and the manufacturing of nano particles. Then add in the costs of trials to prove the safety and efficacy you mentioned, and the cost of human trials.

Anyone wondering why the ibx price has fallen need only look at the cash requirements to get from here to the end of human trials and it should be clear that the $7 million won't last very long and that further substantial dilution is inevitable.