Saturday, October 21, 2017 4:04:49 PM
There were no details available to me. There was millions of dollars spent for very little work.
I couldn't tell you if it was spent on wine or given to Currah.
But it wasn't going into the company.
I could logically piece together parts like management fees and say they were paid to the managers. Those managers were Scott and Currah and I did not know his name. So I said "Scott and friends".
and I was attacked and insulted because of the lack of details.
Now here we are again.
I don't have the details again.
And I am saying that Dan makes bad decisions. One of them being Potts.
Potts can take away the asset in many ways. I am using the intentional failure of the court case as an example.
Italy not happen like I said. It may happen a totally different way. But imo it will happen.
When they don't lose the case but some other stipulation causes that asset loss I will be "wrong".
And the asset will be taken just like I said.
Whole point of this is actually as an explaination of why Dan needs to give the shareholders the details publically.
You have rights and he is not giving then to you.
VHAI - Vocodia Partners with Leading Political Super PACs to Revolutionize Fundraising Efforts • VHAI • Sep 19, 2024 11:48 AM
Dear Cashmere Group Holding Co. AKA Swifty Global Signs Binding Letter of Intent to be Acquired by Signing Day Sports • DRCR • Sep 19, 2024 10:26 AM
HealthLynked Launches Virtual Urgent Care Through Partnership with Lyric Health. • HLYK • Sep 19, 2024 8:00 AM
Element79 Gold Corp. Appoints Kevin Arias as Advisor to the Board of Directors, Strengthening Strategic Leadership • ELMGF • Sep 18, 2024 10:29 AM
Mawson Finland Limited Further Expands the Known Mineralized Zones at Rajapalot: Palokas step-out drills 7 metres @ 9.1 g/t gold & 706 ppm cobalt • MFL • Sep 17, 2024 9:02 AM
PickleJar Announces Integration With OptCulture to Deliver Holistic Fan Experiences at Venue Point of Sale • PKLE • Sep 17, 2024 8:00 AM