Sarissa Resources Inc (SRSR)

[es1]

I will give you that JP.
There were no details available to me. There was millions of dollars spent for very little work.
I couldn't tell you if it was spent on wine or given to Currah.
But it wasn't going into the company.
I could logically piece together parts like management fees and say they were paid to the managers. Those managers were Scott and Currah and I did not know his name. So I said "Scott and friends".

and I was attacked and insulted because of the lack of details.

Now here we are again.
I don't have the details again.
And I am saying that Dan makes bad decisions. One of them being Potts.

Potts can take away the asset in many ways. I am using the intentional failure of the court case as an example.
Italy not happen like I said. It may happen a totally different way. But imo it will happen.
When they don't lose the case but some other stipulation causes that asset loss I will be "wrong".
And the asset will be taken just like I said.


Whole point of this is actually as an explaination of why Dan needs to give the shareholders the details publically.
You have rights and he is not giving then to you.