Followers | 62 |
Posts | 28345 |
Boards Moderated | 0 |
Alias Born | 12/28/2008 |
Saturday, October 21, 2017 10:23:03 AM
re the catch 22 related to judicial castration clause - 4617 f - it is there on paper but we see how judges have responded
As I read it all courts have said 4617 f ties their hands and have granted motions to dismiss based on this clause (i.e. no hearing of the arguments) . By inference those judges have found the solution to the Catch 22 is to grant a motion to dismiss
One judge (not court) has found strongly that there is no barrier as the actions were illegal
Sweeny is in the middle
Sweeny has not ruled on GOV motion to dismiss
Sweeny instead agreed with plaintiffs arguments that without discovery the judge could not determine if 4617 f
FEATURED Cannabix Technologies and Omega Laboratories Inc. Advance Marijuana Breathalyzer Technology - Dr. Bruce Goldberger to Present at Society of Forensic Toxicologists Conference • Sep 24, 2024 8:50 AM
FEATURED Integrated Ventures, Inc Announces Strategic Partnership For GLP-1 (Semaglutide) Procurement Through MedWell USA, LLC. • Sep 24, 2024 8:45 AM
Avant Technologies Accelerates Creation of AI-Powered Platform to Revolutionize Patient Care • AVAI • Sep 24, 2024 8:00 AM
VHAI - Vocodia Partners with Leading Political Super PACs to Revolutionize Fundraising Efforts • VHAI • Sep 19, 2024 11:48 AM
Dear Cashmere Group Holding Co. AKA Swifty Global Signs Binding Letter of Intent to be Acquired by Signing Day Sports • DRCR • Sep 19, 2024 10:26 AM
HealthLynked Launches Virtual Urgent Care Through Partnership with Lyric Health. • HLYK • Sep 19, 2024 8:00 AM