InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 32
Posts 5660
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/16/2010

Re: pitts77h post# 2742

Friday, 10/20/2017 9:11:28 AM

Friday, October 20, 2017 9:11:28 AM

Post# of 4032
I agree..that deal from 3 years ago may not have been in the best interest of shareholders at the time..but these companies (Apple,Samsung etc) are much larger,and the basis of suit much larger..dont you think the runoff to shareholders would be better??..i cant see Doug stealing all that for himself..and even if its the same formula (which were currently not privy too)..cant you assume the settlement and royalty would pay off any debt and leave shareholders sitting pretty??

YOU SHOULD NOT MAKE ANY DECISION, FINANCIAL, INVESTMENTS, TRADING OR OTHERWISE, BASED ON ANY OF THE INFORMATION PRESENTED IN THIS MESSAGE WITHOUT UNDERTAKING INDEPENDENT DUE DILIGENCE AND CONSULTATION WITH A PROFESSIONAL BROKER OR FINANCIAL ADVISOR