InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 389
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/20/2017

Re: ToucanYoucan post# 38922

Thursday, 10/19/2017 11:44:53 AM

Thursday, October 19, 2017 11:44:53 AM

Post# of 63498
It would have been an easier sell showing potential acquisitions.0074 from trips vs hanging on a thin line above the bottom by offering shares would be seen as potential cash if the seller actually sold. Yet we haven't seen a single hard asset acquired with cash or documentation to prove it. Selling investors on acquiring rights to franchise and corporate deals isn't the same as acquiring an actual hard asset that produces revenue for the holding company. Tricky way of selling this, but dangerous for those who don't know the difference of entity and contract structures. When neither the State of Virginia or DC show zero mention of an entity that's a big problem, because it shows that either this is bogus, or that SNMN has simply acquired the corporate rights to sell a franchise concept under a determined entity. That doesn't mean another entity can't do the same, unless written in the contract between SNMN and NGDs past ownership that closed. Seeing as though there is no current registration for an NGD business under that assumed name this is a mystery