Conclusive evidence keeps piling-up on Cisco's violations. Great details relevant and applicable in ChanBond's lawsuit. Thank you. -- Technology was invalid was no defense. -- I thought it was legal. -- Invalidity is not a defense to infringement, it is a defense to liability Induced infringement: -- Knowledge of the patent in suit = CHECK (yes) -- Knowledge of patent infringement = DOUBLE CHECK (yes) https://www.law360.com/articles/493946/synqor-cisco-settle-suit-over-patent-infringement Someday we should (hopefully) win. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xMzCAmPVzhQ