InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 2409
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/29/2012

Re: newgold post# 24843

Tuesday, 10/17/2017 1:00:07 PM

Tuesday, October 17, 2017 1:00:07 PM

Post# of 30005
LOL newgold.....where do I start....

You said..."This law suit is very interesting as to the wording of " a very short time frame ". Now what in the heck in legal terms does that mean"

Answer.....that is why there are judges....do determine what it means. There is no judge in the land that will think that over two years is "a very short time period"

You said..."So a judge will hear that this mess is still going on"

Ummm....no it isn't JL has never even been directly involved with C 1912-2001....ever.....just read the ruling from the 23rd civil court....I AM SURE MS GILMOUR has access to this ruling.. Even if JL was involved and it "was still going on" that is irrelevant to this specific deal with Ms. GILMOUR.

You said.... "BJ has been trying to raise money but not trading means no investment so that is dead"

Now THAT'S an "interesting" statement....MSX has not traded for what....2 years? Johnson was making claims of 10 million plus financing that was "coming in a week" just a few months ago....can you explain that?

You said...."Seems really strange for this lawsuit to move forward because there is no money to be returned to Ms Gilmour"

yourkidingright?......what does "no money to be returned" have to do with the lawsuit going forward???? You have very strange ideas.

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.