NanoViricides Inc. (NNVC)

[arvitar]

Boniuk is discredited because she is not a scientist, played no role in acquiring the data, has no relationship whatsoever to the studies done to collect the data, and has no expertise in the laboratory techniques used to acquire the data.

That's aside from the fact that she was the first investor in NNVC, has a brother with millions of dollars wrapped up in NNVC, and hence has an egregious conflict of interest.

Treating patients in a doctor's office and collecting antiques for 50 years, or being a paid witness in lawsuits, doesn't qualify someone to defend the scientific merits of data about which had no role whatsoever in generating.


I wonder if she will fully disclose all her personal and family conflicts of interest when she presents the data.

Maybe she'll give a reason why a shareholder and crony of the company's CEO is presenting the data, rather than the scientists who are actually responsible.