InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 1066
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/20/2017

Re: None

Monday, 10/16/2017 3:41:41 PM

Monday, October 16, 2017 3:41:41 PM

Post# of 140464
Allow me to posit a thought experiment.

I know a surgeon who has already requested a senhance. I think a lot may adopt it soon because they are sick of intuitive. Only to find out "hey this sucks - davinci was a better platform."

With senhance ahead of us by 2 years, this may create many a bad taste in surgeon's mouths, lending to an attitude of "anything not davinci is a cheap knockoff just stick with the tried and true."

This is one potential downside to senhance paving the way for us; they deflate the "burgeoning frontier" of robotic surgery as just hype...?

Obviously sport offers something that davinci and senhance do not. I believe it has great potential and is a superior offering. And there's no telling what may come. At least senhance will make our fda process easier.