Monday, October 16, 2017 3:18:22 PM
The ones who have done the most research, they own the most shares.
I try to be balanced, but more importantly I try to back up my information with third party verification.
Dilution talk- Facts are simple it is possible, and you will know when it happens, and it has not happened yet. When you can start buying large blocks of shares without driving up the price tremendously, it is happening is the way I will approach that one. And there are people who still want to buy large blocks of shares, and just can't because they are not available at these prices.
The est is all noise, WDDD will not run out of money before making it back to court. They also won't recklessly do anything they can to raise the money.
Thom Kidrin is a VERY large shareholder, so hurting the shareholders hurts him. He has run this on a shoestring budget, cut costs as much as he can.
SO far he has proven he is more than competent as a steward leading WDDD towards district court. WDDD has jumped over every hurdle, and ATVI/BUngie are running out of options. Stats and probabilities right now point to 95% chance we head back to district court with a greater than 10% by my calculations and CAFC IPR APPEAL stats that we go back to District with ALL CLAIMS back (10% chance is conservative based on WIfi One and Oil States SCOTUS case only adding 2% chance), and about 8% chance we will get some claims back.
ABout 80% before the Wifi One & Oil States SCOTUS get factored in we go back to District with just the existing claims we got through PTAB.
The WDDD motions and reply briefs are really strong, the CAFC in my opinion with WDDD briefs in mind should take a real hard look at Bungie/ATVI real party of interest and time bar for IPR.
SO IT IS STILL BUYING TIME! Or you can wait till Judge Panel gets selected, that will be the single most important factor right now before Oil States, good panel selection all of those ODDS go up as you can track what the Judges do and how they react to PTAB decisions and software patents. A bad panel selection is not doom and gloom, but it will decrease those odds. SO to me if you are risk adverse, buy in after Judge panel, but you will pay much more, or buy in before and play the odds and probabilities which are in our favor for a neutral to good judge panel, and reap those benefits.
Stay thirsty my friends.
Recent WDDD News
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/14/2024 08:16:29 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/15/2024 08:47:52 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/15/2024 12:00:25 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 12/19/2023 09:30:21 PM
VHAI - Vocodia Partners with Leading Political Super PACs to Revolutionize Fundraising Efforts • VHAI • Sep 19, 2024 11:48 AM
Dear Cashmere Group Holding Co. AKA Swifty Global Signs Binding Letter of Intent to be Acquired by Signing Day Sports • DRCR • Sep 19, 2024 10:26 AM
HealthLynked Launches Virtual Urgent Care Through Partnership with Lyric Health. • HLYK • Sep 19, 2024 8:00 AM
Element79 Gold Corp. Appoints Kevin Arias as Advisor to the Board of Directors, Strengthening Strategic Leadership • ELMGF • Sep 18, 2024 10:29 AM
Mawson Finland Limited Further Expands the Known Mineralized Zones at Rajapalot: Palokas step-out drills 7 metres @ 9.1 g/t gold & 706 ppm cobalt • MFL • Sep 17, 2024 9:02 AM
PickleJar Announces Integration With OptCulture to Deliver Holistic Fan Experiences at Venue Point of Sale • PKLE • Sep 17, 2024 8:00 AM