InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 4
Posts 1510
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/23/2010

Re: Jayyy post# 10746

Wednesday, 10/11/2017 8:14:30 PM

Wednesday, October 11, 2017 8:14:30 PM

Post# of 13735
Let's just take your false statements one by one...
Hall's office "the size of a Holiday Inn Express hotel room"
For review, the office is listed as 120 square meters. That equals 1291 square feet. That is slightly larger than a 25 by 50 foot space, much larger than any hotel room I've ever stayed in.

Hall's office is a "temp office"
Once again the connotation that somehow a leased 120 square meter office space is illegitimate for a small business is false. Many businesses lease space rather than owning a building according to their needs and expenses.

"Multiple scams run out of the hotel room size scam mill office"
When previously questioned on this point, the only other company identified besides ROTH was Her holdings, a company with over $16 million of audited sales and store locations throughout the country. You could even visit and purchase hair extensions.

You falsely and repeatedly state "COMPANY IS INSOLVENT" yet admit that "your own definition" of insolvent is different than Websters published definition. ROTH is paying its bills and you have no evidence otherwise. In fact your own post with financials indicating an increase in cash from last quarter of only $361 without considering a shareholder advance of $3580 proves that the accusation of insolvency is definitively false.

These false statements conform to an ongoing pattern of verifiably false and damaging statements about ROTH, such as falsely claiming a "verbatim excerpt" from a Consumer Reports article when the article in question was verifiably modified to remove the subject sentence and conceal the change with modifying the punctuation to falsely implicate ROTH and Sucanon in an FDA warning that in fact had nothing to do with the company or product. It is verifiable in post 4477 and many subsequent posts.

I will state further that if you can really prove anything at all that I have posted is factually incorrect then have at it. Aside from one factual mistake that was identified and immediately corrected, there are no errors of fact in my posts, because my information is verifiable from publicly available sources and cited in their entirety without modification

Jacob J. Rosenblum on what every lawyer knows.

“If the facts are against you, hammer the law. If the law is against you, hammer the facts. If the fact and the law are against you, hammer opposing counsel."