Followers | 39 |
Posts | 5491 |
Boards Moderated | 0 |
Alias Born | 07/30/2013 |
Sunday, October 08, 2017 5:56:53 PM
Basically, Ms. Marinov is a key "expert" witness, testifying that Epling is not an "affiliate" of Hemp Inc. The SEC is suggesting that Ms. Marinov is not qualified to be considered an "expert" and therefore the court should exclude her testimony from being presented to the jury.
Pretty much SOP for the plaintiff. I'm sure they would prefer to see a key witness excluded.
It's the Judges call on how the court will interpret whether Ms. Marinov should be considered an "expert". There may be merit to exclude Marinov due to her previous association with a fraudulent company "Plasticon", but Plasticon is in no way whatsoever associated with Hemp Inc outside of this case; two mutually exclusive incidents. The Judge might see Marinov's testimony as substantial and deem it admissible at trial.
I don't know what the Judge will do...
... but I don't think it really matters. Epling never had controlling power over Hemp Inc, and never desired to be an affiliate.
Interpretation is ambiguous by definition.
All court documents are accessible via PACER.
VHAI - Vocodia Partners with Leading Political Super PACs to Revolutionize Fundraising Efforts • VHAI • Sep 19, 2024 11:48 AM
Dear Cashmere Group Holding Co. AKA Swifty Global Signs Binding Letter of Intent to be Acquired by Signing Day Sports • DRCR • Sep 19, 2024 10:26 AM
HealthLynked Launches Virtual Urgent Care Through Partnership with Lyric Health. • HLYK • Sep 19, 2024 8:00 AM
Element79 Gold Corp. Appoints Kevin Arias as Advisor to the Board of Directors, Strengthening Strategic Leadership • ELMGF • Sep 18, 2024 10:29 AM
Mawson Finland Limited Further Expands the Known Mineralized Zones at Rajapalot: Palokas step-out drills 7 metres @ 9.1 g/t gold & 706 ppm cobalt • MFL • Sep 17, 2024 9:02 AM
PickleJar Announces Integration With OptCulture to Deliver Holistic Fan Experiences at Venue Point of Sale • PKLE • Sep 17, 2024 8:00 AM