InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,048.42
(
-0.46%
)
US TECH 100
17,164.00
(
1.10%
)
Dow Jones
38,085.80
(
-0.98%
)
Brent Oil
88.13
(
-0.03%
)
Bitcoin
64,422.17
(
-0.10%
)
Post# of 17377
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Sheepdog

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 103
Posts 43415
Boards Moderated 4
Alias Born 02/13/2010

Sheepdog

Member Level

Re: swingingRichard post# 15860

Wednesday, 10/04/2017 6:49:28 PM

Wednesday, October 04, 2017 6:49:28 PM

Post# of 17377
According to the latest design parameters in the PR, that should be good for about 100KW. And look at the cost savings in eliminating the tubes and fans entirely. New calcs show the original assumption that water was needed were overly conservative, Just uses natural humidity inthe air now.

I have no humble opinions, but I do have opinions and those are what I express in my posts. BUT...I have been wrong before and likely will be wrong again so do your own research and don't blame me if you are too lazy to do so.

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up