InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 2165
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/19/2015

Re: Large Green post# 489235

Wednesday, 09/27/2017 10:41:44 AM

Wednesday, September 27, 2017 10:41:44 AM

Post# of 727367
Interesting that it seems to have been written as unequivocal. What I mean is that some time ago there was a discussion that it was written as 75 / 25 based on the theory that there would never be enough for p's to receive full face value. However it doesn't seem to make that clarification at all.

Added edit: that means there's only one of two possibilities-

A: The Insider's know that there are not enough funds for preferred to receive full face value, or
B: There is more than enough for p's to receive full face value, and they will, with q's getting the other 25%.

Right now, we do not know for sure if it is A or B.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent COOP News