Fannie Mae (FNMA)

[Release us]

Yes I believe they did. I got this info here. I'll read with you.
Sorry I don't believe I got defendants. I'll keep looking.


Plaintiffs

Monday August 14th 2017
New filing in the Fairholme case, click here to view.
Peter Chapman writes, "A redacted version of Fairholme's second motion to compel (to allow the lawyers to see about 1,500 documents the government continues to withhold) is (linked above) and the Appendix to Fairholme's request is posted at http://bankrupt.com/misc/13-465-0385-Appendix.pdf";


http://bankrupt.com/misc/13-465-0385-Appendix.pdf

Defendants

Thursday August 17th 2017
New filing in the Fairholme case.
Peter Chapman writes, "Under seal, our government filed its response (Doc. 386) to Fairholme's second motion to compel this afternoon. A redacted copy should be filed in the coming days or weeks."

Thursday August 24th 2017
New filing in the Fairholme case.
Peter Chapman writes, "Under seal, Fairholme delivered a reply (Doc. 387) to the government's still-sealed response to Fairholme's second motion to compel to Judge Sweeney this evening. A redacted copy should be filed in the coming days or weeks."

Monday August 28th 2017
New filing in the Fairholme case, click here to view.
Peter Chapman writes, "Fairholme filed a redacted copy of its Reply this afternoon. It appears Fairholme redacted nothing. The filing reveals that the government was quibbling about the propriety of the quick peek process and expressing fear about waiving privilege."

http://gselinks.com/Court_Filings/Perry/13-cv-01025-0057.pdf