InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 374
Posts 16832
Boards Moderated 4
Alias Born 03/07/2014

Re: NoMoDo post# 79701

Wednesday, 09/20/2017 6:28:55 PM

Wednesday, September 20, 2017 6:28:55 PM

Post# of 106832
Quote NO LOL, "They were legally blind before the operation. "

100% FALSE dis-information ("Misinformation" per the Miguel bloggy tales). TOTALLY, TOTALLY FALSE.

Thee New England Journal Of Medicine, one of the oldest and most prestigious medical journals in world history and in this nation, said EXACTLY THE OPPOSITE, in the article its editors vetted and reviewed, an article written by EXPERT EYE SURGEONS who reviewed what was referred to as the "hack job" and similar termed "procedure" done at U.S. Stem Cell Clinic, w/ Comella overseeing it all.

The court filed documents and again, EXPERT TESTIMONY of the eye surgeon who tried to salvage the women's eye sight also stated, "THEY HAD FULLY FUNCTIONAL LIVES, COULD SEE TO LIVE A REASONABLE LIFE ETC AND ARE NOW TOTALLY, LEGALLY BLINDED, LITERALLY HAVING THEIR EYE BALLS ESSENTIALLY BLOWN OUT, by a NON M.D., introduced to them as "YOUR DOCTOR" and while they were FALSELY POINTED TO THE Clinicaltrials.gov website for what was a SHAM clinical trial, actually no "clinical trial" at all, just a CASH FOR HACK BUTCHER JOB" (paraphrased, but near word for word, including commentary in an Op-Ed penned by thee Dean of Harvard Med school).


Your statement COULD NOT BE MORE GROSSLY WRONG OR FACTUALLY INCORRECT to state they were "ALREADY BLIND". WRONG !

POST ONE LINK TO ANY SOURCE, ANY ARTICLE, ANY COURT DOCUMENT, ANY MEDICAL JOURNAL that states, "THE LADIES WERE ALREADY BLIND", LOL !! Cause it DOES NOT EXIST and WILL NOT BE FOUND. Not a chance in H.


By contrast.....


FL: Article, BLIND LADIES "INVESTIGATION PENDING" ??

RECENT NEW ARTICLE DATED ONLY ABOUT FIVE SHORT MONTHS AGO-

Published in the FLORIDA DAILY BUSINESS REVIEW, April 11, 2017.

HOLY FREAKING COW? This is a local South Florida paper, and the female business writer/author for a South Florida paper printed since 1926, she says there is a "INVESTIGATION PENDING" regarding USRM and their blinding of at least three women at their little "clinic" biz thingy, as written about in the world's top medical journal, THEE NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE. HER FREAKING WORDS, NOT MINE, LOL !

DIG THIS RECENT INFO- wild stuff if you ask me (Someone should try and contact the author to see if she'll reveal her sources or what she knows?). AMAZING INFO IF YOU ASK ME:


http://www.dailybusinessreview.com/id=1202783473144/Unsafe-StemCell-Eye-Injections-Draw-Rebuke-Prompt-Settlements?slreturn=20170416183946

Quote of full article:

"Unsafe' Stem-Cell Eye Injections Draw Rebuke, Prompt Settlements

Celia Ampel, Daily Business Review
April 11, 2017

The procedure was supposed to treat their macular degeneration—but instead, it made them blind. The two women who lost their sight have settled their cases against a South Florida eye doctor as their experience draws national attention.

Coral Gables law firm Grossman Roth Yaffa Cohen filed lawsuits on behalf of the two patients, both over age 70, who traveled to Sunrise and paid $5,000 each for what they believed was stem-cell therapy that would help with age-related vision loss. According to thecomplaints, U.S. Stem Cell Inc. injected each woman in both eyes with what it claimed were stem cells harvested by removing fat tissue from patients and processing the tissue to isolate the cells.

Instead, both women quickly ended up blind, with one of them unable even to perceive light. Their experience was highlighted March 16 in the New England Journal of Medicine after doctors at the University of Miami's Bascom Palmer Eye Institute observed the results of the injections.

"The patients paid for a procedure that had never been studied in a clinical trial, lacked sufficient safety data, and was performed in both eyes on the same day," the physicians wrote in the journal article. Experimental injections in both eyes, they continued, "are both atypical and unsafe."

The final claims in the litigation were confidentially settled days before the article was published, drawing attention from the New York Times, the Associated Press and BuzzFeed. U.S. Stem Cell and the nurse who performed the 2015 procedures settled earlier in both cases, which were filed in separate circuits, one in Miami-Dade and one in Broward.

The last remaining defendant was Dr. Shareen Greenbaum, an ophthalmologist with Hollywood Eye Institute who performed pre-procedure exams on the patients, according to the lawsuits. Greenbaum settled with plaintiff Elizabeth Noble in 2016, but the case filed by the other patient, Patsy Bade, did not reach a settlement until last month.

Bade alleged Greenbaum became involved with U.S. Stem Cell through a friend she met at her gym. Starting in 2013, the doctor was held out as the principal investigator for what was listed as a clinical trial on the U.S. National Institutes of Health website ClinicalTrials.gov. (According to a warning now posted on the site, the studies listed on the site are not necessarily endorsed by the NIH.)

According to the lawsuit, Greenbaum realized the company was nothing more than a for-profit business after hearing U.S. Stem Cell employees lie to patients and seeing there would be no gathering of information or follow-up with the patients about the procedure. But she agreed to stay on to do the pre-procedure exams.

"Dr. Greenbaum did nothing to communicate her concerns about the clinical trial, nor did she do anything to dissuade Ms. Bade from going forward with this procedure," the complaint alleged.

Greenbaum's attorney, Marc Ganz of Nosich & Ganz in Coral Gables, declined to comment. Grossman Roth partner Andy Yaffa, who represented the patients, also declined to comment on the settlements except to say they were to the mutual satisfaction of the parties.

U.S. Stem Cell Inc. said in a statement that it does not currently treat eye patients and that its clinics "have successfully conducted more than 7,000 stem cell procedures with less than 0.01% adverse reactions reported."


No criminal charges have been filed over the injections. An investigation is pending.

[color=purple]Grossman Roth just took on another stem-cell therapy case in Atlanta, and more of these cases may pop up around the country if oversight isn't ramped up, the authors of the New England Journal of Medicine article warned.

"Although numerous stem-cell therapies for medical disorders are being investigated at research institutions with appropriate regulatory oversight, many stem-cell clinics are treating patients with little oversight and with no proof of efficacy," the doctors wrote."

END OF ARTICLE from a local Florida biz journal and author.

AN INVESTIGATION IS PENDING???

HOLY FREAKING COW ??? The author uses the words "CRIMINAL CHARGES" and then "INVESTIGATION IS PENDING"? WTH? Sh*t, checked my dictionary and "PENDING" means "on going" or "waiting a decision" or "in process awaiting an outcome" etc?

WOWZA !!

SEE THAT WORDING...THEY "ENDED UP BLIND"...that means they WERE NOT BLIND, LOL !! WRONG !

Or just go to thee NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL AND READ THE ENTIRE THING THAT STARTED THIS BALL ROLLING and IMO, earned Comella and USSC a big ole "FDA WARNING LETTER", one that has a good chance of sinking their leaky boat if you ask me.....straight to the bottom...and maybe even worse consequences....

COURT "testimonials" BLIND LADIES !!

The biggest "news" ole BHRT/USRM ever got, LOL! (well, now I think the formal “FDA WARNING LETTER” may be eclipsing even the THREE BLIND LADIES NEWS). Google "U.S. Stem Cell Florida" and 8/10 of the top, page 1 Google search returns used to be BLINDED LADY'S REAL NEWS, now it’s mostly the FDA SITE ITSELF WITH THE WARNING LETTER and WARNING LETTER PR and then NPR and TIME Mag and some other major news outlets on the “FDA WARNING” to Comella and the clinic biz. It's tough to get on Google page-1 results, but they did it by golly !

This reads like a bad soap opera to me-

https://www.ipscell.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Amended-Complaint-Bade-Suit.pdf

Wow, intentional misuse of the Federal database Clinicaltrials.gov...that don't sound good if you ask me? Serious stuff there IMO.

GREAT new article/video on USRM BLINDING PATIENTS:

April 2017 article, fresh and new....only 5 short months ago- and it's a doozy !


http://www.sun-sentinel.com/health/fl-stem-cell-injections-court-complaint-20170322-story.html

JUST STUNNING allegations and facts revealed by that local, Florida based investigative journalism team.

ALL about the USRM little "stem cell clinic" they peddled as "THEIR CLINIC" but in SEC filings then state they only own 33% of it, and which FL secretary of state docs show was organized by good ole Kristin Comella.


http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=EntityName&directionType=Initial&searchNameOrder=USSTEMCELLCLINIC%20L140001239491&aggregateId=flal-l14000123949-9b6a17cd-f497-4f9d-bf75-70db01851fa8&searchTerm=us%20stem%20cell&listNameOrder=USSTEMCELL%20P990000718151


How far did the NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE "news" spread - well, sure looks WORLD WIDE TO ME? We of course now know with 100% CERTAINTY the FDA knows all about this and is “on it” like STINK ON A MONKEY (just read the 483’s and inspection dates in the warning letter, it’s all there), all happening when they were supposedly reviewing that ole RMAT "data" or whatever per bloggy tales, LOL !

I mean how the hell could the FDA not know about this medical damn fiasco, which even involved falsely pointing patients to the "clinicaltrials.gov" database, according to the published expert testimonial allegations, let alone non M.D.'s being introduced as "YOUR DOCTOR", LOL !! Yeah, and the ole FDA is gonna hand over the keys to the jet and let these dudes do more human experimentation? Personally, I doubt it IMO.


BUT, it freaking gets even better than THAT SCATHING FLORIDA written article linked above:

https://www.concordregister.com/sunrise-stem-cell-clinic-behind-blindness-cases-is-largely-unregulated/

Read what the Dean of freaking HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL personally penned in an editorial about what the ole "clinic" is doing to folks, and the subsequent "news" heard round the world when probably the most prestigious and oldest medical journal in existence, THEE NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE wrote about this cluster F they did during their NON FDA APPROVED ole "treatments":

"Gross violation of professional and possibly legal standards"

Those words were penned by (and he's writing about USRM):

Dr. George Daley, dean of Harvard Medical School




http://uk.businessinsider.com/ap-doctors-say-unproven-stem-cell-treatment-blinded-3-women-2017-3

"In an editorial accompanying the journal report, stem cell expert Dr. George Daley, dean of Harvard Medical School, called the clinic's treatment careless.

"This report joins a small but growing medical literature highlighting the risks of such wanton misapplication of cellular therapy," he wrote. Providing such treatments for profit outside a proper research setting "is a gross violation of professional and possibly legal standards," he said."

THAT is the DEAN of the HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL, in his own words, talking about U.S. Stem Cell Clinic, LLC and how they blinded THREE WOMAN (three at least that are known at this point)


When the damn DEAN of perhaps the most prestigious medical school on PLANET EARTH takes time to write an editorial, to accompany a paper that reached publication in the NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, well, you got some problems at your "biz" IMO.

Don't "think" the freaking FDA listens to the DEAN of the Harvard Med School? That is one tight fraternity of folks there, and they influence Washington D.C. in a big ole way, in every aspect. The pinnacle of the IVY LEAGUE and their graduates hold seats often, on every key committee and chairmanship and position of power in every circle of influence that matters.

The damn DEAN of the Harvard Med School singled out USRM and U.S. Stem Cell Clinic and published about it, in his own writing, on his own dime and time. WOWZA.

NEJM "new" Article how USRM BLINDED WOMEN:

ALL published in one of the world's most prestigious and oldest and most credible medical journals, DATED MARCH 16th, 2017, which makes it RECENT NEWS to me. It's almost impossible to get published in the NEJM; it can easily take 6 months from a paper being submitted, to then extreme vetting and peer review, to even "hoping" to being assigned a publication date in such a world class medical journal. FEW doctors/researchers ever get their papers or writing accepted for publication in the NEJM. It's the stratosphere of medical publication.

THE FACT, FACT, FACT that the New England Journal editors and peer review committee accepted it for publication, makes it an extremely important piece of medical literature, just on the merits and credibility of the NEJM alone. THUS, the reason the article/medical paper is receiving WORLD WIDE PRESS COVERAGE.

The author's themselves, world recognized medical experts and the NEJM itself use words like "horribly botched" and "bad beyond measure" what was done to these three, grossly misled woman, who have now had their lives ruined for all intents and purposes according to the expert and world class MD's interviewed and cited in the NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (In addition to such experts as Harvard, Stanford MD's and PhD scientists among many experts contacted and asked for commentary in several of the subsequent articles cited/linked below).


TRULY WORLD-WIDE "NEWS" COVERAGE...YEPPER:

Because of the extreme prestige and incredible reputation and credibility of the NEJM, that RECENTLY PUBLISHED MEDICAL ARTICLE/paper, it just got spread literally WORLD WIDE via being picked up by every major and credible NEWS SOURCE ON PLANET EARTH, just to name a few: DRUDGE REPORT, NY Times, Wall Street Journal, CNN, NPR, NBC, ABC, Washington Post, AP news wire services, Reuters, several of the UK major papers, as far south as New Zealand, and then India, Singapore news (hello Southeast Asia/Asia Pacific last time I navigated those airways), Africa (oh gee, ANOTHER continent), Japan (uh oh, major, major world power, big time newspapers and TV news, that covers East Asia, getting real close to China) plastered all over Canadian press, looks like probably EVERY major "Florida" news source ran with it and still going, the N. America papers look like they covered every major outlet from Alaska to the Eastern seaboard and everything in between including powerhouses like Chicago, many stories only being hours old as of this AM (Magazines now picking it up too; just made Men's Magazine, which happens to land in just about EVERY DOCTOR'S OFFICE I've ever had the pleasure of parking my butt in their waiting room lobby, in the past 5 years or so), and it literally propagated rapidly across the "news wires" to reach and cover the entire planet….literally:


Looks WORLD WIDE TO ME....and still going (wonder how their little clinic biz thingy is gonna survive this mess? Anyone looking up their name to research um, is gonna find these stories/links for YEARS to come IMO, as they're in the who's who of major publications/press now). Oh wait, MAYBE THAT’S WHY THEY CHANGED CLINIC NAMES TO “STEM CELL CENTERS OF EXCELLENCE” and created the ole “GACP” thingy….eh….ya think maybe…..I know what I think….LOL !

http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1609583

SEE THAT DATE ON THE NEJM "recent" published MEDICAL ARTICLE. It's dated MARCH 16th, 2017, which to me, MAKES IT RELATIVELY "RECENT" NEWS. NOT "old" as is falsely being claimed. It can take a long, long wait to get published and get a publication date in the NEJM. Who knows how long ago that excellent paper was submitted for review and publication?

http://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2017/03/15/520118310/3-women-blinded-by-unproven-stem-cell-treatments

https://blog.cirm.ca.gov/2017/03/15/three-people-left-blind-by-florida-clinics-unproven-stem-cell-therapy/comment-page-1/

LOOK AT THAT, freaking CIRM, the California major stem cell group/govt agency ran the story. DAMN, that can't be good for ole USRM, especially if they're now trying to pitch the FDA for some supposed "approval" for gawd knows what?

http://stemcellfoundation.ca/en/

http://stemcellfoundation.ca/en/blog/#post-3238

NEWS is all over Canada's science and stem cell community, big time.

http://www.miamiherald.com/news/health-care/article139003663.html

http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/business/biotech/sd-me-clinical-trials-20170315-story.html

http://time.com/4703909/stem-cell-treatment-lose-vision/

TIME MAGAZINE. Millions are gonna read about this...uh oh?????

http://uk.businessinsider.com/ap-doctors-say-unproven-stem-cell-treatment-blinded-3-women-2017-3

UK, aka Europe.

http://www.wflx.com/story/34893920/doctors-say-unproven-stem-cell-treatment-blinded-3-women

http://uk.reuters.com/article/us-stemcell-consumers-ophthalmology-idUKKBN16M3D6

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/three-women-left-blinded-after-botched-stem-cell-trial/ar-AAop3vk

http://www.nationalpost.com/m/wp/news/blog.html?b=news.nationalpost.com/news/world/three-women-lose-sight-after-florida-clinic-injects-stem-cells-into-their-eyes-to-improve-their-vision&pubdate=2017-03-16

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/afp/article-4318266/Unproven-stem-cell-therapy-causes-three-women-blind.html

http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2017/03/16/world/science-health-world/unproven-stem-cell-therapy-makes-three-u-s-women-blind-deemed-off-charts-dangerous/#.WM1QUVsrKt8

JAPAN, that makes East Asia, almost China.

http://www.ctvnews.ca/health/unproven-stem-cell-treatments-leave-3-women-blinded-1.3326562

https://www.wsj.com/articles/stem-cell-clinics-treatments-left-three-patients-blind-doctors-say-1489614350

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=11819362

Down South to New Zealand, meaning the Aussies probably know by now too.

http://www.nation.co.ke/lifestyle/health/Unproven-stem-cell-therapy-blind/1954202-3851556-15rv5vsz/

.ke domain, that's Kenya, hello African continent.

https://www.gizmodo.com.au/2017/03/florida-clinic-blinds-three-patients-in-botched-clinical-trial/

Oh, there's .au domain, Australia covered.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/03/170315182348.htm

http://www.chicagotribune.com/lifestyles/health/ct-women-blinded-by-unapproved-stem-cell-treatment-20170316-story.html

http://www.foxnews.com/health/2017/03/15/three-patients-blinded-by-stem-cell-procedure-physicians-say.html

https://www.pressreader.com/usa/san-francisco-chronicle-late-edition/20170316/281496456095820

http://www.todayonline.com/daily-focus/health/unproven-stem-cell-therapy-causes-three-women-go-blind

“About TODAY
Singapore’s second most-read newspaper, TODAY offers quality content in a convenient, compact format. The free newspaper offers readers an unrivalled package of the top local and international news reports, as well as insightful, thought-provoking commentary and analysis.


Singapore, so that's SouthEast Asia/Asia Pacific region. BAMMO, spreading like WILDFIRE (NO, not the 70's song by Michael Martin Murphy)

http://www.wtsp.com/news/doctors-say-florida-stem-cell-clinic-left-3-women-blind/423054933

http://www.latestafricanews.com/ke/kenya/2017/03/unproven-stem-cell-therapy-causes-three-women-to-go-blind/

AFRICA again, how many continents does that make now? I need to count?

http://www.newvision.co.ug/new_vision/news/1448711/unproven-stem-cell-therapy-causes-women-blind

https://1israelnews.com/unproven-stem-cell-therapy-blinds-three-patients-at-florida-clinic/

Israel, means it's hitting the "Middle East" news, looks like to me?

https://www.davidicke.com/index.php/article/406386/three-women-blinded-off-charts-dangerous-stem-cell-trial-meant-cure-mild-vision-loss

https://ipscell.com/2017/03/nejm-paper-links-3-patients-blinded-to-publicly-traded-stem-cell-clinic/

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/stem-cell-treatment-blinded-three-women-florida/

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/mar/16/three-women-with-eye-disease-blinded-by-unproven-stem-cell-treatment

http://www.livescience.com/58287-unproven-stem-cell-therapy-blindness.html

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2017/03/15/three-women-blinded-by-unapproved-stem-cell-treatment-at-south-florida-clinic/?utm_term=.e862f156e90a

http://www.metronews.ca/life/health/2017/03/15/doctors-say-unproven-stem-cell-treatment-blinded-3-women.html

http://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/three-women-blinded-bogus-stem-cell-treatment-florida-n734091

http://www.healthline.com/health-news/three-women-blinded-in-unproven-stem-cell-treatment

https://www.mbnews.one/health_news_96956.htm

http://www.immortal.org/32973/three-women-blinded-stem-cell-treatment-florida/

http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/881192/unproven-stem-cell-therapy-causes-three-women-to-go-blind

https://www.buzzfeed.com/peteraldhous/blinded-by-stem-cell-injections

http://khn.org/news/experimental-stem-cell-treatment-leaves-3-women-blind/

http://www.stuff.co.nz/science/90511597/experimental-stem-cell-treatment-leaves-three-women-blind

https://arstechnica.com/science/2017/03/stem-cell-clinic-masquerading-as-legit-research-blinds-three-in-florida/

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-stemcell-consumers-ophthalmology-idUSKBN16M3D6

https://tampanews.co/doctors-say-florida-stem-cell-clinic-left-3-women-blind/

http://www.menshealth.com/health/unproven-stem-treatment-blinds-three-women

Men's Health, it's hitting the magazine world now too then. I see LOTS of that mag in doctor's office waiting rooms.

https://www.statnews.com/2017/03/15/stem-cell-patients-blind-macular-degeneration/

http://med.stanford.edu/news/all-news/2017/03/unproven-stem-cell-therapy-blinds-three-patients-at-florida.html

Stanford, that's a power-hitter in the academia circles. Big league academia, like world class.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/women-blinded-untested-stem-cell-treatment-article-1.3000090

http://www.sciencealert.com/an-off-the-charts-dangerous-clinical-trial-in-florida-has-left-3-women-blind

http://www.sfchronicle.com/health/article/3-cases-of-blindness-raise-questions-about-stem-11004630.php

https://science.slashdot.org/story/17/03/16/2136247/unproven-stem-cell-treatments-blind-3-women

http://www.cbc.ca/news/health/stem-cell-therapy-blinds-patients-1.4026734

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/15/health/eyes-stem-cells-injections.html?_r=0

https://www.rt.com/usa/381084-stem-cell-vision-loss/

http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/877280

https://www.baaz.com/trending/story/58c9ad63a9e362543b46a211

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/stem-cell-clinical-trial-women-blinded-patients-new-england-journal-medicine-thomas-albini-a7632051.html

http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/unproven-stem-cell-therapy-in-us-causes-three-women-to-go-blind

http://www.krmg.com/lifestyles/experimental-stem-cell-treatment-leaves-women-blind/TyXDzpiYJ1Wi9rYHsrnToM/

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13882626

https://www.geneticliteracyproject.org/2017/03/16/3-women-blinded-after-receiving-stem-cell-therapy-for-macular-degeneration/

https://www.yahoo.com/news/doctors-unproven-stem-cell-treatment-blinded-3-women-210610493.html

http://www.680news.com/2017/03/15/doctors-say-unproven-stem-cell-treatment-blinded-3-women/

https://www.newdelhitimes.com/doctors-say-unproven-stem-cell-treatment-blinded-3-women123/

https://www.aol.com/article/news/2017/03/16/3-women-blinded-in-stem-cell-clinical-trial/21897597/

http://www.kalb.com/content/news/Doctors-say-unproven-stem-cell-treatment-blinded-3-women-416269853.html

http://earth-chronicles.com/science/as-a-result-of-treatment-with-stem-cells-three-women-were-blinded.html

http://kcbx.org/post/3-women-blinded-unproven-stem-cell-treatments

http://www.nbc-2.com/story/34893920/doctors-say-unproven-stem-cell-treatment-blinded-3-women

https://1newsnigeria.com/unproven-stem-cell-therapy-blinds-three-patients-at-florida-clinic/

https://www.zawya.com/uae/en/story/Patients_left_blind_after_paying_for_experimental_stem_cell_treatment-ZAWYA20170317061559/

http://abc7ny.com/health/doctors-say-stem-cell-treatment-at-clinic-blinded-3-women/1804596/

https://www.adn.com/nation-world/2017/03/16/3-women-blinded-by-unapproved-stem-cell-eye-treatment-at-florida-clinic/

http://www.sun-sentinel.com/health/fl-sb-sunrise-stem-cell-20170316-story.html

http://www.wfdd.org/story/3-women-blinded-unproven-stem-cell-treatments-0


THAT is a butt load of free "coverage" for a pretty much no name, micro lil medical "clinic" in ole Florida and their PENNY STOCK "PARENT" COMPANY and ole “Chief Science Officer” and ole "33% owner of said clinic" per SEC filings...seems to me. Like the FDA didn’t “see” this (unlike the BLIND LADIES), along with every prospective customer or medical researcher and anyone else of importance in the "Stem cell world", LOL???

Gawd, it's got more coverage than freaking Beyonce and Justin Bieb combined if you ask me, LOL !! And it ain't the "good" kind of coverage if you ask me for my lousy SUB TWO CENTS worth....gawd what a freakin mess.

I'd guess EASILY MILLIONS of people read THAT "NEWS"....what did someone post....that the ole "RADD FESTIVAL" (LOL, gawd that cracks me up....just gives me visions of Jeff Spicoli for some reason..RAD DUDE !) ...1000 people versus MILLIONS who read about the TALE OF THREE BLIND LADIES in pretty much every major news publication around this planet...WOWZA...wonder how many read the “bloggy tales” versus all those major FACT BASED NEWS OUTLETS ABOVE???? A few hundred “maybe” versus literally MILLIONS…..eh ?????


AGAIN...PRODUCE ONE, ONE CREDIBLE LINK or M.D. STATEMENT OR INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM OR MED JOURNAL ARTICLE OR SIMILAR that states, "THE THREE ELDER LADIES WERE ALREADY LEGALLY BLIND"....cause it is a 100% FALSE STATEMENT and FACTUALLY DOES NOT EXIST.....NOPER...NOT A CHANCE IN H.......

Posts are only my amateur opinions, personal views and thoughts. They are not any type of investment advice. Do one's own due diligence.