Worlds Inc (WDDD)

[madprophet]

In regards to CAFC Judge Panel selection.

A safe assumption is that there are people who are waiting on the judge panel before increasing, decreasing, or starting a position.

3. Judge selection, if mayer or wallach, or both, or any anti patent judges are on the panel for this case it will hurt, risk goes up and you know 'patent swing trader' will dump more lol - you can google search for anti patent cafc judges to see who they are. That being said, if none of them are on the panel it would be a minor positive, but claim materiality still takes precedence and as I have said, the market is saying the remaining claims are not material given the share price.

4. Then finally, the ruling by the cafc - if they bring claims back, the stock and market will react positively, if nothing more and no change I doubt the stock will move much

If a selection of Judges as mentioned in above quote happens it is suggested that it will be a negative catalyst for PPS of WDDD, it then logically follows a Judge panel with 2 or 3 patent friendly or pro patent judges would have a positive effect on PPS. A patent friendly Judge Panel would also likely increase the chances of regaining some claims lost in PTAB.
So a bad panel "ït will hurt" and a good panel would be ä minor positive"? However there are people that are waiting on the judge selection before starting a position. I would suggest that a pro patent judge panel would be a major catalyst. As stated in the quote above, risk goes up- bad...again logically follows risk goes down---good.