InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 25
Posts 2552
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/06/2009

Re: AlphaInvestor8 post# 27624

Wednesday, 09/20/2017 10:27:01 AM

Wednesday, September 20, 2017 10:27:01 AM

Post# of 46340
A couple of glaring incorrect statements.

If Wifi one gets decided before CAFC decision? Okay, now Oral arguments were May 5th on WIfi One, CAFC decision usually reached within 6 months putting the decision on that due in by Nov 5th. WDDD WILL NOT EVEN HAVE HAD ORAL ARGUMENTS BEFORE NOV 5TH. So it will be pretty difficult to get a CAFC decision on WDDD before Wifi One.



CAFC decision will take about 6 months. Being as this will not be on calendar before the first week of Dec, that puts decision in about June.
BY all accounts and many sources, the Oil STates SCOTUS case will be decided June or before as the overwhelming majority of case get decided by SCOTUS before they take the break in June. So the below statement will be incorrect. Like saying BUngie will cross appeal (which was also incorrect and stated by Alpha) if you follow the timelines, this statement will also be proven incorrect.

Oil States is also important but the CAFC will rule here well in advance of Scotus ruling on that one next year



And finally if CAFC gives back claims or doesn't give back claims, this goes up as long as they make it through CAFC. That means we are on to district court, so yes in fact the stock. I still love the statements by you that say Susman and Godfrey will probably not represent WDDD in district court if they don't get claims back. Seeing as they have an agreement with WDDD, that one will amazing and I Will be happy to bow down to your expert analysis. Too funny This one is a little murkier, but the other 2 thoughts above, yeah those are WAY off.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent WDDD News