Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[955]

Mick Mulvaney said it best when he effectively stated 100% participation is needed to spread the costs. This works............in other countries who don't have the worries of malpractice insurance. We've come full circle with our sue-happy society.

Why is it someone talks about any issue and health care emerges. I heard a friend of mines brother say he just thinks everyone should have the same health care as congress. He has Tricare for himself. I remember working without health care when I was just starting out. I didn't have college so it was understood by me that I would have too move through some jobs in hopes of better benefits. It is part of the incentive most working people have experienced. Thinking about health care for all I have too think how would that change for me. My insurance was subsidized through work and is now part of my retirement, but very soon I will have too move into medicare. Still there was a portion I would have too pay for the insurance and then there was co pays and deductibles too be met. Since ACA my cost have risen. I will still have too elect a secondary insurance and the net effect is a big jump in my insurance costs. My question for those who preach on free health care I would like too hear just how they see that happening when ACA involved the out of pocket costs that I have. Taxes would have too go up significantly too pay for it which again we are at, who is going too pay for it, all those who don't lift a finger too work and expect everything for free. Quantity of car will suffer as even Canadians come too this country for faster service on life important issues.