InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2134
Posts 93135
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/17/2011

Re: kairos post# 3170

Sunday, 09/10/2017 6:17:10 PM

Sunday, September 10, 2017 6:17:10 PM

Post# of 31769
There is nothing that is an exact science...there are always certain situations that cause change...but charts sure do win over throwing a dart and praying and though I think great dd is an advantage it too is not an exact science...I bet you can name 100s of tickers that failed to deliver what they promised on the time frame that was promised...

Charts do not measure the past for the pasts sake but any great student of the indicators of charts will tell you that studying the past can very well give a very high percentage of what the future looks like...especially if one understands patterns and reading candlesticks...

In my opinion the only ones that question the effectiveness of charts are the ones that really have not spent years studying them to realize all the nuances that create the explanations of why charts to what they do...

I would agree that charts are not an exact science and at times what you read is not what happens but if a baseball player is considered great by being wrong 65% of the time...and if a broker is considered great if he/she gives you a 20% return on your money...then I would say that charts are more of an exact science then any other avenue when it comes to trading...

CLWD...is a very bullish chart...but the Williams is extremely overbought...rsi is overbought and is has a bit of room...pps is trading outside the upper bollie and you have a double top...chart is preparing for a bearish move on a bullish chart...very possible for a pop but it will retrace within a day or two...
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AIAD News