InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 206
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/21/2017

Re: cockstockandloaded post# 2576

Thursday, 08/24/2017 4:16:34 PM

Thursday, August 24, 2017 4:16:34 PM

Post# of 6682
Wow! Where to start?

I suppose I should thank you for providing the link that supports my post on the ball mill use (pic in article) and references a potential "mobile system" for aviation fuels. I did your homework for you, but the truth based on science in black and white is harder to grasp than that magical cost per pound numbers being quoted. That article in June ALLM quoted top end prices, but sugar is highly variable. you can look it up, but you won't, however USDA keeps track of sugar production pricing monthly. It's all publicly on the internet if your willing to do the work.

If you read anything...I hope you read this link that I posted early on and is from a PhD citing research on ALLM's peers in the same technology in 2016;

http://www.biofuelsdigest.com/bdigest/2016/07/10/whats-new-and-important-about-c5-and-c6-sugars/

If you truly are unbiased, with an open mind read the article above while drawing upon what ALLM has said they can do (since 2014, mind you) and tell me if you still feel the same. How can everyone in the world but ALLM be so incompetent? I'll give you cost comparison argument because the article accounts for raw materials such as feedstock and enzymes, yet the pricing for enzymes has decreased 72% in 4 years! Who knows what it is now? Better yet, why isn't ALLM included in this article since they have the solution to all the high costs currently experienced by their competitors? ALLM is too busy posting pictures of a golf outing (half of their pics BTW) and other peoples articles on Facebook to be bothered with their own. No tangible value to the potential investor.

Leave honest companies such as TESLA and Amazon out of it...I am sure they did market analysis to see if the economics were worth it. ALLM can't even be bothered to create a mobile unit and collect data to show it's shareholders and the rest of the world it does work. Meanwhile..no new progress has come out of the ALLM camp such as the purity of their sugars,or the companies lined up to test their sugars and lignin....something tangible and verifiable. I'll say it again...supply and demand. BTW, do you really think USDA cares one bit whose name is on that check for the Florida plant as long as it clears?

After reading this article by Dr. Bauer I can't help but wonder who is telling the truth; ALLM or the rest of the world? Why doesn't Dr. Bauer and everyone else know about ALLM and their revolutionary, step-saving, less toxic pre-treatment process...why? Either 2 likelihoods exist;
1.) they do know of ALLM and the technology is not as they say, or.
2.) they don't know which makes the leaders at ALLM grossly negligent

One or the other, CSL... How can you still not have doubts after all I have presented you? Not one word from the opposition to refute what I have stated.

If you're in it to make a buck, fine. Just don't poo-poo the rest of us who wish to make sound, rational, logical decisions based on science and economics before we decide to buy or not. You know the history surrounding this company smells, but you won't admit it because you bought their sales pitch without doing the work. You ask why I do this...because I have gotten burned by companies just like this in the past that were penny stocks and it ticks me off when they deceive investors. They take advantage of the lax, less stringent requirements required of NASDAQ or DOW, hoping to lure less savvy people who are in it just to make a quick buck. What's wrong with holding them accountable? Whether you own 1 or 1 million shares, you own part of that company and they in turn should be transparent with their shareholders.

I wish you the best of luck with your new plant, should you buy it.