Followers | 1447 |
Posts | 13605 |
Boards Moderated | 3 |
Alias Born | 09/16/2015 |
Sunday, August 20, 2017 11:06:51 AM
Clearly you now have trapped yourself. No one said that Lattuca attorneys didn't go after every single possible asset of Purdon in which GEGI was clearly one of them. Then the new name of GEGI too. That also got added. You see. These are named parties inside of a lawsuit. Named set of defendants. Yet- the judgment was against Purdon. And the name of the court case and judgment - is clearly only Again at Purdon at the end of the day.
Post all you want. I already posted it you tool. At it clearly shows the name of the case as LATTUCA vs PURDON and THUS- the main defendant as RAYMOND PURDON. No other way possible does the court case itself change. The named lead defendant never changes. The attorney changed it to Purdon when realized he doesn't own GEGI. Lattuca is a L O S E R. Also spoke to courts who concurred. They also think he's a loser.
Sorry your attempts to twist and misdirect no longer hold merit anymore. The filings hitting OTC speak much louder than anything you can repost and post again
FEATURED POET Announces Design Win and Collaboration with Foxconn Interconnect Technology for High-speed AI Systems • May 14, 2024 10:09 AM
FEATURED Element79 Gold Corp Reports Exceptionally High-Grade Results from Lucero • May 14, 2024 7:00 AM
VAYK Added New Manager for Expansion into $64 Billion Domestic Short-term Rental Market • VAYK • May 14, 2024 9:00 AM
Avant Technologies Equipping AI-Managed Data Center with High Performance Computing Systems • AVAI • May 10, 2024 8:00 AM
VAYK Discloses Strategic Conversation on Potential Acquisition of $4 Million Home Service Business • VAYK • May 9, 2024 9:00 AM
Bantec's Howco Awarded $4.19 Million Dollar U.S. Department of Defense Contract • BANT • May 8, 2024 10:00 AM