InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 32
Posts 10384
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/20/2016

Re: plutoniumimplosion post# 40515

Saturday, 08/19/2017 12:26:53 PM

Saturday, August 19, 2017 12:26:53 PM

Post# of 54032
If I am such a distraction in court you would have thought I would have been deposed. Not just in this case but in the other cases you boasted about. The alleged Rico suit, the counter suit and the Berman complaints are out for service yaddy yaddy dooo.

Don't worry though, I will happily be available as rebuttle witness to any fairy tales your pals want to weave...


GAME SET MATCH TAUG

By the way, why do you state that TAUG was offered way more than $850,000 already? Maybe you can provide a link to that LMAO.

No other company has come along to allege the same things against Cowan. Certainly Cowan had other clients that were damaged by the Meyler error both directly (same reason as TAUG), and indirectly (damage caused by proximity to the blast). But I guess not



Really, you have evidence that Cowan et al did the same thing to a previous Company. Which company was that. You have read all the depositions right....

And the whistle blowers no doubt will tell a story of intrigue of an attempt by TAUG CEO and the paid consultant to attempt to legally extort money from Cowan. And that will be crushing.



legally extort money from Cowan.

Law. the crime of obtaining money or some other thing of value by the abuse of one's office or authority. oppressive or illegal exaction, as of excessive price or interest

The only one that tried to extort anything is Cowan and the insurance company by failing to properly adjust the claim and mitigate the immediate and potential damages. The extortion was violating communication rules regarding TAUG's requests for its work papers and then stalling in providing them back to TAUG while penalties were accruing and conversions of stock were imminent. I guess now you can also add Meyler committing perjury in his deposition.

So TAUG is legally extorting??? How, by taking the case to trial and having independent qualified experts that Herzog, the insurance carrier and TAUG agreed upon to evaluate the claims. How is that legally extorting...LMFAO.

Oh what a tale Cowan's ex head of compliance and the Mediator will tell in court.. And when that is done there will be websites regarding the insurance companies conduct in this. They are responsible for that scumbag Ronald Herzog failing to respond to TAUG's requests for work papers right. He did hold up the return of the work papers even after TAUG the first mediation was scheduled. That delay was certainly one of the reasons the conversions finally started to happen..

And....if you state the insurance carrier offered well over $850,000 I am curious as to why they would do that if this was just a run of the mill 250k case.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.