Validian ALREADY announced to the world that they have done exactly that. But because they chose to only share the results of that review in the technical data packets they provide EVERY SINGLE prospect and customers we are supposed to believe that they have not done so, or that they are lying about it. That is absurd.
There is a LEGITIMATE REASON they have not published that data for their SHAREHOLDERS to read. And the reason is that the SHAREHOLDERS are not going to make VLDI worth $20 billion, the CUSTOMERS are with their VP-enabled applications, generated revenues and end point totals.
Sharing the details of that review would inevitably require the reviewing company to reveal trade secrets of the full feature set of VP in their report, secrets that if revealed at this time before VLDI has had a chance to get their foot in the door in the cybersecurity world would give their competition advance warning of the features they will be up against.
Doing so would allow any of their competition to beat them to the marketplace with their version of the same feature. It would not matter to any of VLDI's prospects or future prospects that those features were in a Point Solution environment and will fail when tested by the hackers. What will matter is that when VLDI comes out with their version of that feature set in a VP-environment the world would yawn at the disclosure and would dismiss that disclosure as too little too late.
The fact that VP's version is totally secure because it is in a VP-environment would be lost to the average company. All they would see is that little VLDI came out SECOND with a version of a feature that has already been tested by the BIG BOYS and it had already failed. They would NEVER give VLDI a chance to PROVE that their version of that feature can succeed because it is VP-based.
And even in the case of features that had not failed, Validian would be seen as the also-ran little startup trying to mimic with their technology what had already been successfully marketed by the Majors. It would be IMPOSSIBLE for VLDI to convince ANYONE to abandon their current product that succeeds 93-97% of the time and buy VLDI on the promise that they will succeed 100% of the time. Those companies will be convinced that there is not enough to be gained by abandoning their current system. Their techs will argue that they have ALMOST provided 100% protection and if the company will just give them a LITTLE MORE TIME and a little more money they will be able to do it.
In the case of some of those Majors, it would require them to be willing to walk away from hundreds of millions of dollars in cybersecurity research and development and many man-years of development time just to get what they THINK they are already capable of providing for themselves with just a few more tweaks to their system.
VLDI has wisely chosen to ONLY reveal their feature sets under the protection of NDA's in a professional marketing environment. And they are not about to reveal them publicly just so a few shareholders can feel warm and fuzzy about their investment.
If the information they have already provided in the PRs and SEC filings where they are legally bound to tell us the truth or face legal consequences isn't enough for someone to feel they are making an INFORMED trading decision, then common sense says VLDI is not the right stock for that individual. But that is NOT the same thing as saying VLDI is a sham, or that BB is a liar, thief or scam artist.
Professional investors NEVER waste their lives or their money on stocks they do not trust or stocks they believe can NEVER make them a profit. Professionals understand that life and their fortunes are too valuable to squander in such a frivolous manner.
TPP
JMHO
There are none so blind as those who WILL NOT see, none so deaf as those who WILL NOT listen, and none so ignorant as those who only learn from those who have less information than they do.
