InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 8
Posts 1848
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/18/2017

Re: proffetti post# 5707

Thursday, 08/17/2017 7:43:04 PM

Thursday, August 17, 2017 7:43:04 PM

Post# of 11254
something doesn't smell right here. ir says that they decided to refile so that the ftc would have more time to review. wouldn't that be the ftcs responsibility not the filing companies. why would the companies give the ftc more time? why not let the ftc take care of filing and approve it or disapprove it one or the other. just like last time they didn't let the ftc deny it they withdrew why? this smells to high heaven something isn't right with rite aid delaying this deal so many times. they should allow the ftc to vote at least once denying the deal but force them to vote on it. I knew something wasn't right when they withdrew the last time and didn't force the vote which they should have. a denial would have been better than a withdraw. now here we are again submitting to the will of the ftc once more dragging this deal out so it wont get done by the two companies at the helm of the deal and the ftc. I reckon all of these parties have a dog in the hunt and their dog is short rite aid. they are shorting rite aid all of their friends relatives and butt buddies are shorting rite aid walgreens managements clonies rite aid managements clonies and the ftc clonies wall street clonies they are all shorting rite aid because they know that its a lock to short it...so they drag it out until they decide to go long rite aid then you will see them not hold the deal off anymore or they might just delay the deal forever and let rite aid file bankruptcy then they wont have to cover their shorts at all.