Wednesday, August 16, 2017 7:18:08 PM
If, as has been reported by some here, that Bridgeport/Smaran note describing the imminent injection of $21 million into NTEK can't be real, because (a) the company doesn't exist, or (b) the signer was not involved with the company on that date, then it might be evidence of criminal fraud.
That is, did NTEK provide that piece of paper to Gulas to convince him that NTEK was legit, or did they provide it to him so that he, in turn, could try to convince Paramount not to pull their titles? In the latter case, maybe Gulas was aware of the deception, or maybe he wasn't. Either way, that's fraudulent, and the letter would represent forgery, to boot.
It might yet be relatively benign, but their pleas to seal the evidence really seem to come down to nothing more than "Hey, that stuff makes me look like a criminal! No fair using it!".
VHAI - Vocodia Partners with Leading Political Super PACs to Revolutionize Fundraising Efforts • VHAI • Sep 19, 2024 11:48 AM
Dear Cashmere Group Holding Co. AKA Swifty Global Signs Binding Letter of Intent to be Acquired by Signing Day Sports • DRCR • Sep 19, 2024 10:26 AM
HealthLynked Launches Virtual Urgent Care Through Partnership with Lyric Health. • HLYK • Sep 19, 2024 8:00 AM
Element79 Gold Corp. Appoints Kevin Arias as Advisor to the Board of Directors, Strengthening Strategic Leadership • ELMGF • Sep 18, 2024 10:29 AM
Mawson Finland Limited Further Expands the Known Mineralized Zones at Rajapalot: Palokas step-out drills 7 metres @ 9.1 g/t gold & 706 ppm cobalt • MFL • Sep 17, 2024 9:02 AM
PickleJar Announces Integration With OptCulture to Deliver Holistic Fan Experiences at Venue Point of Sale • PKLE • Sep 17, 2024 8:00 AM