Wednesday, August 16, 2017 7:18:08 PM
If, as has been reported by some here, that Bridgeport/Smaran note describing the imminent injection of $21 million into NTEK can't be real, because (a) the company doesn't exist, or (b) the signer was not involved with the company on that date, then it might be evidence of criminal fraud.
That is, did NTEK provide that piece of paper to Gulas to convince him that NTEK was legit, or did they provide it to him so that he, in turn, could try to convince Paramount not to pull their titles? In the latter case, maybe Gulas was aware of the deception, or maybe he wasn't. Either way, that's fraudulent, and the letter would represent forgery, to boot.
It might yet be relatively benign, but their pleas to seal the evidence really seem to come down to nothing more than "Hey, that stuff makes me look like a criminal! No fair using it!".
FEATURED Element79 Gold Corp. Appoints Kevin Arias as Advisor to the Board of Directors, Strengthening Strategic Leadership • Sep 18, 2024 10:29 AM
Mawson Finland Limited Further Expands the Known Mineralized Zones at Rajapalot: Palokas step-out drills 7 metres @ 9.1 g/t gold & 706 ppm cobalt • MFL • Sep 17, 2024 9:02 AM
PickleJar Announces Integration With OptCulture to Deliver Holistic Fan Experiences at Venue Point of Sale • PKLE • Sep 17, 2024 8:00 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Mt. Vernon Gold Mine Bulk Sample, Sierra County, California • NBRI • Sep 11, 2024 9:15 AM
One World Products Issues Shareholder Update Letter • OWPC • Sep 11, 2024 7:27 AM
Kona Gold Beverage Inc. Reports $1.225 Million in Revenue and $133,000 Net Profit for the Quarter • KGKG • Sep 10, 2024 1:30 PM