InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 3
Posts 230
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/21/2015

Re: rubberworm post# 27645

Wednesday, 08/16/2017 4:58:57 AM

Wednesday, August 16, 2017 4:58:57 AM

Post# of 115007
This debate is more about pissing on initial project pricing to divert investor attention away from a serious first mover threat than it is about real world long term economics on this chemical. You also have no f$cking clue.

In relation to overall end product cost, this is not significant at all especially when you factor in end user benefits. Ultimately, the price will sit where it needs to be and will be a reflection of true price elasticity on both supply and demand dimensions.

If the forecasted price realizes through market demand maturity, then you can bet scy and cleanteq will take these prices, and good for them - perhaps a better market price would help them with project financing as well.

I sense there is serious money on the table on all sides, and also a few faces waiting for someone to eventually crack eggs on. Ultimately if Niocorp gets going, I believe the other projects are at risk of getting swallowed by someone, perhaps creating a cbmm situation as world reserves are relatively tight against plausible demand. In my humble opinion.



Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NB News