InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 4
Posts 1510
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/23/2010

Re: Jayyy post# 10291

Sunday, 08/13/2017 4:38:38 PM

Sunday, August 13, 2017 4:38:38 PM

Post# of 13735
You falsely and repeatedly state "COMPANY IS INSOLVENT" yet admit that "your own definition" of insolvent is different than Websters published definition. ROTH is paying its bills and you have no evidence otherwise.

This conforms to an ongoing pattern of falsely claiming a "verbatim excerpt" from a Consumer Reports article when the article in question was verifiably modified to remove the subject sentence and conceal the change with modifying the punctuation to falsely implicate ROTH and Sucanon in an FDA warning that in fact had nothing to do with the company or product. It is verifiable in post 4477 and many subsequent posts. The following is but a small sample of posted verifiably false information with citations based on publicly verifiable information:

2. A false statement that Sucanon in post 3963 contains only inactive ingredients despite the active ingredients being publicly stated, in one location directly above the cut and pasted inactive ingredients listed on the healthcanada website.
3. Misrepresentation of the contents of the FDA response letter by leaving out their clear statements that Sucanon is a drug per the food and drug act, that Sucanon has undergone "substantial clinical investigations" as they reference the press release announcing presentation of a 12 week study of Sucanon in prediabetics in which 81% showed normalized HbA1C at the conclusion and that the study was presented at the 2013 EASD annual meeting and the abstract included in the EASD journal. Here is the link so readers can evaluate for themselves as opposed to incomplete and misleading excerpts:

https://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FDA-2014-S-0023-0011

4. False statements that Canagen (the Sucanon distributor for India, a multinational company) is a fake company and located in a diner.
5. A statement in post 5014 that "I stand behind all those statements about this indefensible fraud"
6. The stated purpose of the modification to the Consumer Reports article was for "scaring others away" as noted in post 4550.
7. A false statement that "HSBC has no substantial agreement with these crooks". The agreement with HSBC was announced in a press release 5/3/2016 and finances ongoing Sucanon orders in Mexico.
8. Multiple false statements that sales in Mexico are down 90% which has been repeatedly disproven based on published quarterly and yearly revenues at otcmarkets.com
9. Posting as fact false information from scam.com (as an example stating falsely that Clark is a convicted felon) and further stating that you "stand behind" the information as true.
10. Posting verifiably false information from hotstocked.com and modified with continued false information on share sale prices and amounts. Shares were never issued below .003 as indicated in supplemental information from quarterly reports at otcmarkets.com.

I will state further that if you can really prove anything at all that I have posted is factually incorrect then have at it. Aside from one factual mistake that was identified and immediately corrected, there are no errors of fact in my posts, because my information is verifiable from publicly available sources and cited in their entirety without modification

Jacob J. Rosenblum on what every lawyer knows.

“If the facts are against you, hammer the law. If the law is against you, hammer the facts. If the fact and the law are against you, hammer opposing counsel."