InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 181
Posts 50621
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 12/20/2004

Re: None

Tuesday, 08/08/2017 10:29:56 PM

Tuesday, August 08, 2017 10:29:56 PM

Post# of 49370

And these quotes were from a few weeks ago. The one in red confirming the quote from 2013 is still true.


Nope. Not about hjoe. hjoe never was in the position at any time to 'consider' if they should take revocation or some other plan.
Hjoe owners were derelict in their duty to shareholders and their own company and there wasn't a deal, there wasn't a conversation with the SEC and there wasn't an iota of suggestions from the SEC about hjoe taking a revocation so they could get their paperwork in order. None of any of those quotes have anything to do with hjoe and repeating quotes well out of content does nothing to change the sad fact that hjoe had no input or say in the SEC stopping the trading of hjoe and revoking the stock.

The SEC had numerous letters of correspondence with hjoe which means the SEC had numerous questions concerning hjoe's filings and stock activities, which it is also documented that hjoe wasn't answering properly or not at all. And the revoking of hjoe was one of the fastest seen in quite a while in the pinks.
Obviously the SEC had some real reasons for doing so.

It is all on the shoulders of the owners and principals for the debacle of the revoke with no choice to hjoe. Call it incompetence, ignorance, arrogance or just plain country stupid, it's the principals screw up. And now hjoe is trying to play the same product game again. Thing is, this time the hjoe crew don't have stock dilution to pay their salaries.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.