"knownbrave" I applaud your vim and vigor and your loyalty to the Cyclone brand. It is quite suspect though, almost like you were monetarily incentivized to push this stock as much as you can. But that is not the point I suppose. There are facts and there are falsehoods:
It is a fact that Cyclone as a company has not demonstrated that they have the ability to produce an engine of any sort, no matter how many suffixes they add to the "Mark" name. <---I still believe that there was a misunderstanding on the spelling of Mach...but I digress.
It is also a fact that Cyclone has spent an incredible amount of investor money, cycled through a number of employees (if you have been watching their main webpage) and have not been able to demonstrate any more than an arbitrary spinning shaft. We have no evidence that any of the various "Marks" have been able to produce any power. The only engine that did produce any power was the engine that got sent up to CAR and that one seemed to be plagued with reliability issues.
It is also a fact that a stock that was once approaching $1 is now lower than any monetary amount that exists on this planet; too bad the $ZIM is out of circulation. It did not get to that point based on any sort of successes but crippling failures. Ones that any sane person would learn dearly from.
Now I know it is attractive to try to compare the inventors at Cyclone to the Edisons and Teslas of old but that is a bigger insult to their genius and contribution to the modern world than I can think of right now. Cyclone is not a company that is trying to put out anything of merit. I am sure the leaders are just trying to get bought out and run away.
Look, if you are a pumper, good on you, make your money...there are worse ways to do so. But if you are a true believer in this farce I honestly feel sorry for you.
-Chuck
