Monday, July 24, 2017 8:38:01 AM
In most cases you look at why should there be punitive damages, in this case it is the opposite. Why wouldn't there be punitive damages.
Forget the original malpractice, failing to notify a client of a significant threat, writing the the Board that they were independent for 2015, taking $25,000 to re audit 2014 when there was a clear conflict, failing to respond to requests for work papers, then holding the work papers as a form of blackmail.
Cowan's career could easily be ruined.
FEATURED Cannabix Technologies Launches New Compact Breath Logix Workplace Series and Prepares for Delivery to South Africa • May 7, 2024 8:51 AM
Moon Equity Holdings, Corp. Announces Acquisition of Wikolo, Inc. • MONI • May 7, 2024 9:48 AM
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM