InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 550
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/27/2016

Re: seifer1975 post# 39814

Monday, 07/24/2017 8:38:01 AM

Monday, July 24, 2017 8:38:01 AM

Post# of 54031
I think it will be alot more than that. figure It is astounding how many acts these guys did that were in direct violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct.

In most cases you look at why should there be punitive damages, in this case it is the opposite. Why wouldn't there be punitive damages.

Forget the original malpractice, failing to notify a client of a significant threat, writing the the Board that they were independent for 2015, taking $25,000 to re audit 2014 when there was a clear conflict, failing to respond to requests for work papers, then holding the work papers as a form of blackmail.

Cowan's career could easily be ruined.