InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 36
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/03/2017

Re: None

Saturday, 07/22/2017 2:05:14 PM

Saturday, July 22, 2017 2:05:14 PM

Post# of 29974
Eh! GREG ious. C-1912-2001 is The Trial v. MINERA NEVADA SpA where JRL is defeating Barrick in Chile, as Barrick has two positions, IT does not know and is employer of the thief 1995-2017 at that Trial.

C-1912-2001 sole ownership 2014, (as per SUPREME COURT OF CHILE decision 2014 restoring MSX client's ownership of C-1912-2001 by October 16th, 2014; was reported to BCSC 2014, 2015 and 2016, 2017.

TSX, BCSC, IROC, Barrick and its "stake holders engager" Greg Panagos, have lied to the BCSC and financial markets with the opposite, to suit Barrick's public libel v/ MWR and its client, December 21, 2011.

Either the regulators went with Barrick in the fraud or to jail, thanks to the Section 400(1) of the Criminal Code of Canada for peddling a false prospectus Pascua Lama, without clean ownership.

No victories of Barrick are available to the racket, at least zero victories that they could disclose as material facts, without letting the title less at Pascua Chile cat, out of the legal bag.

That is why Barrick hired Greg Panagos to go and engage against the truth of judicial record in Chile, via thugs posting at MSX.

Now he is desperately trying to make good in his lies to BCSC to force MSX shutdown. And where is he now?

Lost at C-1912-2001 Trial with two lies at Supreme Court of Chile.
Lost at the Trial v. C-1912-2001 Judge. (false Court testimony)
Lost at BCSC v. MSX and its client (LIBEL & damages charges 2017)
Lost at TSX and NYSE, falsification of TESOROS ownership 2001-2017
Lost at the 18th Civil Court as SAN JOSE INC owners of Pascua Lama
Lost at 23d Civil Court Trial ex president and current plus banhers
Lost at Criminal trial to thief of TESOROS, being expanded.
Lost at 5th Civil Court with expanded LIBEL to June 30th, 2017 crime
Lost at Canadian Embassy legalization of Supreme Court validated trial
Lost at probing that Barrick or Chile subsidiaries own MINA PASCUA
Lost at PROTOCOL PASCUA LAMA trial via fabrication of ownership
Lost at PASCUA LAMA sold LAMA to China after killing environment
Lost at MINA PASCUA CHILE fled after killing the environment
Lost at environmental excuses. They lost on title to MSX and client
Lost at making good in contracts as BARRICK CHILE LIMITADA born 1928?
Lost at probing that BARRICK CHILE LIMITADA was born before ABX
Lost at probing permit SERNAGEOMIN to produce Gold at LAC'S areas
Lost at being able to own TESOROS concessions in Chile
Lost at showing clean TESOROS titles in Court. DO NOT EXIST.
Lost at showing permit to produce and sell Gold to deutsche bank ag
lost on legality of Barrick's royalty or Gold & Silver futures crimes.
Lost at dealings with HSBC and SCOTIA BANK at Pascua Lama Ponzi
Lost at Foreign investment totals to back up the SILVER WHEATON Ponzi 2008-2017 with a USD1.05 investment and 0.000001% interest.
Lost at being able to deny that MSX or its client are C-1912-2001
Lost at trying to con MSX into answering what BCSC is charged with
Lost at trying to hide identity after caught.

Technically my list of losses for Barrick and its bogus Pascua title corporations in Chile, would occupy the best of 100 pages.

It is clear that the racket faces 5 years and one day per count n Chile. The above counts, are all in public domain contracts.

Greg, better seek a fast arrest in Canada or you face BCSC and Chile as the provider of fake news and legal alibis for Barrick.

Your criminal career is over pal, join the called to wit.

Do you also like to go first class to Chile like your BCSC associates? Las line of the plane for you, in the corner.

These crooks have failed to make an impact in my consolidation of clear, existing and proven crimes of PASCUA LAMA racket.

I can not wait for the announced block buster PR by MSX.

Anyone, if I missed criminal or illegal items in my list, it is because the crimes are so huge and many, that indeed shall surpass the 55 count. Crimes, are not considered victories in Chile.

What a manic response by the cornered trouble shooter of Barrick, hired engager of stake holders. He sees MSX as the largest stake holder of the assets of Barrick? his presence to defend is felt!

To the lonely vigilant hired to bring down MSX via BCSC.

You are caught and BCSC shall give your identity to Chilean Judicial system as suggested by others at this Board.

BCSC is not able to challenge a victim of its crimes to decide on a date to resume trade. That is acting like a bully racket.

There is ample material for a thriller movie here, indeed.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.