InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,214.08
(
0.51%
)
US TECH 100
17,659.16
(
0.32%
)
Dow Jones
39,387.76
(
0.85%
)
Brent Oil
83.95
(
0.47%
)
Bitcoin
63,062.16
(
3.06%
)
Post# of 61155
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

specutator

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 83
Posts 13525
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/19/2009

specutator

Re: SilverBack post# 36227

Friday, 07/21/2017 2:56:54 PM

Friday, July 21, 2017 2:56:54 PM

Post# of 61155
LOL again! The filing of a 10Q or 10K does not prevent new dilution of company shares nor does the filing of a NT 10Q/K stop it.

The false expectation is that the public does not have a current filing which is also "ASSuming" as we stated.

The claim was that a NT 10Q/K stops the company from selling or transferring restrictive company shares.

I've already posted the rule 144 that refutes that! It should be reread for the detail in selling of restrictive shares.

My posted comments are only my considered opinion based on the reality as I see it. Your reality may be different.

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up