Thursday, July 20, 2017 11:53:26 AM
I see that I have hit a sore spot when I talk about Industrial Nanotech's horrible reputation. I am not sure where you claim I can make it worse. Is it at the Better Business Bureau where INTK already enjoys an F rating, which is the lowest possible rating? Is it at OSHA, where INTK is illegally marketing a product as "OSHA Safe Touch" (it is illegal to market a product using the OSHA name)? Is it at the FTC or at the SEC, where INTK already has multiple complaints? Is it at Bain and Company, where INTK falsely represented that they had a partnership? Is it at INSULO CORP that was scammed for $20,000? Is it at Florida Attorney General's consumer fraud division? Is it the United States government programs that INTK imagines and represents that they have participated with?
As for the multiple RED FLAGS that I mentioned, which one would you like me to elaborate on?
As far as me selling my technical products to US Government agencies and laboratories, I see that you are unduly surprised. In the real world there is nothing unusual about this. Unlike Industrial Nanotech, other companies find no need to make up stories about their sales.
Avant Technologies Equipping AI-Managed Data Center with High Performance Computing Systems • AVAI • May 10, 2024 8:00 AM
VAYK Discloses Strategic Conversation on Potential Acquisition of $4 Million Home Service Business • VAYK • May 9, 2024 9:00 AM
Bantec's Howco Awarded $4.19 Million Dollar U.S. Department of Defense Contract • BANT • May 8, 2024 10:00 AM
Element79 Gold Corp Successfully Closes Maverick Springs Option Agreement • ELEM • May 8, 2024 9:05 AM
Kona Gold Beverages, Inc. Achieves April Revenues Exceeding $586,000 • KGKG • May 8, 2024 8:30 AM
Epazz plans to spin off Galaxy Batteries Inc. • EPAZ • May 8, 2024 7:05 AM