This is CD11. He somehow knows about the Forged 5/19/14 Nash signature on a Max Sound created fraudulent 'Vedanti Systems Limited' contract.
A phony contract that was found in some 600 documents to Judge Davila's Northern District Court: submitted under Penalty of Perjury by Max Sound and their lawyers' October 2015: declarations too, under penalty of perjury. Those forgeries kept popping up, even after case was dismissed and for very concrete and reasoned findings about 'no standing' and why: 11/24/15 was dismissed.
Greg and Rurouni, I would not allow, nor countenance lawyers' and Maxd theft of 2001-2014 $32 Million spent on growth of 'from dirt-concept--patents and inventions.
Your grotesque marketing by you all as 'worldwide license' and worldwide OWNERSHIP' of Vedanti Systems and/or VSL Communications Ltd confusion to readers.
And the inventions? They are not Max Sound's inventions. Never were. Our CEO and officers could not sell the assets May 30, 2014--onward; not after Max Sound and Halpern tried to convince the world that the owners of Vedanti were so damned stupid that they would hand over Billions of Dollars to a penny stock guy who has what? a phony audio company? No. I signed for Trade Secrets and Post Its Notes for Adam Levitt, a famous, successful litigation lawyer: but that didn't happen. You lied, buried Trade Secrets, buried Post Its Notes. And lied all over the Internet, lying that you had a contract for Patent Infringement.
Your Netflix lies and litigation you sued them and Google with, who shared same law firm with in Germany: threw my German patent May 2015 --2015 May --into INVALIDATION QUEUE.
Think anybody can sell or monetize to an outside buyer with Invalidation -a fact -in Germany? Think we should have kissed your ass and said -that's okay, though we didn't know you and lawyers stole us there too (and don't tell this board -well it was your idea Connie)
- because that would only be true in context of what you didn't do: you didn't file with us as VSL Communications Ltd /Max Sound vs Google: for Trade Secrets and with Post Its Notes on each page -or on any page: none were used. Worse, You sued as Vedanti Systems when you had no contract. To have done so would destroy Vedanti Systems. And worse than all of that? you signed a 7 figure penalty with Google in August 2014: 'if any post its are seen on the media you and each lawyer will be fined a 7 figure penalty'. We knew none of that, none of your antics.
Northern District dismissed 11/24/15: shortly thereafter, Google filed Invalidation of USPTO patent of mine and our group Vedanti; exactly what I fought against with Max Sound. Then Max Sound also filed Appeal 9th Circuit. And too, they wanted to 'prove' the first forgery wasn't a forgery -though that was impossible, they found 'another document' and said it wasn't a forgery, so they used a 2nd forgery under penalty of perjury to prove the first forgery wasn't a forgery. I was cited as being the author of that lie; I got Chicago lawyer Robert Greenspoon to submit to Judge Devila -my Amicus Brief: proving that I was out of state, and futhermore, we had travel receipts -and more t prove their perjury.
A 2nd ruling by Judge Davila was February 2016: he ruled that VSL Communications Ltd was a separate corporation, that Constance Nash was not an alter ego of either, and furthermore, there was NO CONTRACT FOR LICENSE OF PATENTS AND TERMS SUBMITTED TO Northern District. So Max Sound made another run at that. With additional forgery.
"insert from IHub records: this one from a CD11: giving the dictionary explanation of Forgery."
Monday, 06/13/16 08:17:35 PM
Re: Rurouni post# 4728
Post #
4729
of 7452 Go
Ohhhhh ok, so Maxd decided they needed a contract from Vedanti (the patent owner) that makes sense. Then they decided to just fabricate one and use specifically in their evidence?
Definition's of FORGERY
'The act of making or producing an illegal copy of something so that it looks genuine, usually for financial gain'
'The action of forging a copy or imitation of a document, signature, banknote or work of art'
Hmmm this raises a bit of a flag and seriously Ru what a stupid explanation!!
iHub NewsWire
