InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 484
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/10/2014

Re: Oren1976 post# 1088

Thursday, 07/13/2017 12:21:48 PM

Thursday, July 13, 2017 12:21:48 PM

Post# of 2099
The way phase 2 worked, as I understand it, is that everyone (n=46) was given VB-111 as a monotherapy. Then upon progression (median of 1 dose) they were put in 1 of the 2 cohorts: 1) Avastin alone or 2) Combo. Here's a link for review:

http://ir.vblrx.com/news-releases/news-release-details/new-phase-2-patient-data-presented-asco-strengthen-evidence-anti

A total of 46 patients were enrolled in two sequential cohorts. In the first cohort, patients were treated with VB-111 as monotherapy for a median of only one dose and, upon disease progression, switched to Avastin (bevacizumab) alone as standard of care (Limited Exposure cohort). This cohort behaved like an Avastin historical control with a median Overall Survival (mOS) of 8 months.

In the second cohort, patients continued to receive treatment with VB-111 after progression, in combination with Avastin as the standard of care (Treatment Through Progression cohort). This cohort received in median 4 doses of VB-111, about 8 months of treatment.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent VBLT News