Monday, June 26, 2017 10:42:50 PM
On this topic, you are incorrect.
I'll try one more time.
cause here is not a defined term; its relative, and would have to be subject to scrutiny. Fact is, Watt can't be fired for his actions as conservator. His actions as conservator are not reviewable and his actions can not be second guessed. If you could just make up a "cause" then why write anything in there, because "cause" could be leaving the toilet lid up under your premise. But as actions as "conservator" his actions, are not a "cause" they are immune.
As for the sweep.
Dividends have to be declared to be payable - I'd think you'd probably agree with that.
If the board does not declare a dividend no dividends are payable.
If watt instructs the board to not declare a dividend (in his role as conservator), no dividend is payable.
Thus, Watt could, retain all capital and in his capacity as conservator, his actions would be beyond review.
This isn't hard to understand its very easy and very plain language.
FEATURED Element79 Gold Corp. Appoints Kevin Arias as Advisor to the Board of Directors, Strengthening Strategic Leadership • Sep 18, 2024 10:29 AM
Mawson Finland Limited Further Expands the Known Mineralized Zones at Rajapalot: Palokas step-out drills 7 metres @ 9.1 g/t gold & 706 ppm cobalt • MFL • Sep 17, 2024 9:02 AM
PickleJar Announces Integration With OptCulture to Deliver Holistic Fan Experiences at Venue Point of Sale • PKLE • Sep 17, 2024 8:00 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Mt. Vernon Gold Mine Bulk Sample, Sierra County, California • NBRI • Sep 11, 2024 9:15 AM
One World Products Issues Shareholder Update Letter • OWPC • Sep 11, 2024 7:27 AM
Kona Gold Beverage Inc. Reports $1.225 Million in Revenue and $133,000 Net Profit for the Quarter • KGKG • Sep 10, 2024 1:30 PM