SSL is NEVER secure, not even for one minute of a single day. The Point Solution approach that is currently being used by the software giants is totally vulnerable, so much so that the NSA and other security agencies have a name for their vulnerability. They call it zero-day vulnerability because it takes the hackers less than one day to break into them. They can NEVER protect the "full" or "complete" cycle of data because at some point in time the user has to transfer the data from one software environment to another or from one hardware device to another.
100% of the current cybersecurity efforts by 100% of the software giants are based upon some form of Point Solution. And the EXPERTS, not Bruce Benn or VLDI, but the actual agencies that are trying desperately to solve this problem, have gone on record stating that NONE of the current cybersecurity methods that are currently in the retail world work. 100% of them are vulnerable to zero-day attacks. LET ME SAY THAT AGAIN...THE EXPERTS SAY THAT EVERY ONE OF THEM IS VULNERABLE. And they go one step further and make the argument that the only solution that will work is one that secures data 100% of the time and never has to decrypt it. That is NOT my opinion just becauseI have heard it from Bruce Benn, it is my opinion because I have seen the reports written by the NSA and the other cyber security experts that are advising 100% of the software companies, Enterprise corporations, militaries, and government agencies in EVERY nation in the civilized world to take that approach to cybersecurity. So unless we are to assume that Bruce Benn has influenced their research with his lies I suggest that we are dealing with an indisputable FACT, not my opinion or Bruce's spin.
And the thing that makes VP different is that it has IN FACT created a totally secure environment in which the data is NEVER handed off to other software or moved from one piece of hardware to another. The data is totally useable, accessible, editable, copiable, transmittable while remaining protected by any one of 26 of the world's unbreakable cyrpto-algorythms.
So, at least for a while, an estimated 5-7 years, VP will IN FACT render all VP-protected data 100% immune to cyberattack from all KNOWN METHODS OF ATTACK.
There is ZERO doubt in anyone's mind, INCLUDING BRUCE BENN'S, that EVENTUALLY the hackers will find a way to get behind that security wall and steal the data.
But who cares? It will be 5-7 years from now and by then VLDI will have been bought out for whatever amount of money. And those who allowed their trading decisions to be based upon the FACTS will have moved on with their fortunes to other stocks. And those who insisted, even in the face of the claims from the NSA and the REAL experts, that even VLDI's approach doesn't work will be telling their children and grandchildren about the stock they ALMOST made some money on.
I will be in the first group.
TPP
