Hi Plbecky & all, I am confused: 1. Why would one refer to a case that has been thrown out every time it is brought to court? 2. Wouldn't one want to refer to POW shareholders as the injured parties and advance that presentation? 3. Is Jerry Burleson not doing due diligence at this time & throwing stuff on the wall to see what sticks? 4. Or is this normal for class action lawsuits, start at the beginning & carry on from there? Thanks & Best Regards, Jon
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.