Indoor Harvest Corp (INQD)

[TenKay]

That's just it. He throws out these statements that have little objective reality. Proven??? How, where, when?

If he is referring to the Tweed pilot...given that nothing has been released, provided or otherwise disclosed...is he not getting ahead of himself? (not that I expect any sort of peer reviewed independent evaluation)...

But then that is how he rolls.

The entire basis for the spin off was to separate the Cannabis and non-Cannabis applications of the technology. The Cannabis side was going to catapult off of a Texas license and somehow exploit a Colorado license (which BTW publicly traded company CANNOT have ANY ownership interest in). The "non-Cannabis" part Indoor Harvest Corp...was going to be able to distance itself from the Cannabis parts as he indicated to me that his non-Cannabis customers and financiers weren't comfortable with it.

But now we are back to a single pubco WITHOUT a Texas License nor an ability to get a Colorado one...

...so does that mean the non-Cannabis clients don't figure into the mix anymore?...and somehow they have created all this tech for Cannabis "expression"??

INQD is now a full blown OTC penny marijuana company...which is not the best company to keep.