Yes, every company that responds to an SEC Admin Proceeding gets a Hearing and more Hearings if they continue to argue against the A.L.J. revoking their registration. In all prior instances the A.L.J. still revokes using repeated failures to file Financials, and no assurances that failures to file would not occur again, and similar fault reasons. If you research all revocations on this board you'll find the ~2 % that were revoked despite the company arguing against revocation. The A.L.J writes specific reasons for each company in contrast to the more generic and simplified revocation Orders on DEFAULT for the 98% that do not respond.
About 98% of suspended SEC registered companies never respond so that's why and when we see quick revocations on DEFAULT....the default being they did not respond. Included in that ~98% are the companies that agree without a defense to the A.L.J. revoking their stock registrations.
DBMM must know the inevitable outcome will be revocation so they are stalling for their own reasons, eg., to sell shares while the revocation process drags on, or to stymie Asher for whatever reasons, or perhaps to look sanctimonious in defending against revocation so that aggrieved shareholders won't sue their keesters when the stock registration is finally revoked.
To bite the worm of incite is to bite the HOOK of the antagonist . They win .
