Monday, June 05, 2017 6:44:47 PM
The fact that FHFA and Treasury transactions are beyond judicial review while it doesnt make them legal, certainly limits anyone challenging their legality.
Personally, to me they are not lawful. They were contrived to steal and transfer benefit from one class to another (entity) if you will by effectively the same entity (government) which makes them an unlawful transaction, ie. not arms length. However, if challenged, revert to the above, you can't challenge even their one sided transactions, because congress and the president said so.
Now, i am sure that others may argue, "only things found to be illegal are illegal, all the other stuff isn't until such". But i find that argument on the merits fail, because, yesterday i saw someone run a stop sign. Yep didn't stop at all. But, because they were not issued a citation, and that citation that wasn't issued didn't go thru the judicial process, therefore, while the act is illegal, their action was not. That is in some peoples mind.
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM