Monday, June 05, 2017 6:44:47 PM
The fact that FHFA and Treasury transactions are beyond judicial review while it doesnt make them legal, certainly limits anyone challenging their legality.
Personally, to me they are not lawful. They were contrived to steal and transfer benefit from one class to another (entity) if you will by effectively the same entity (government) which makes them an unlawful transaction, ie. not arms length. However, if challenged, revert to the above, you can't challenge even their one sided transactions, because congress and the president said so.
Now, i am sure that others may argue, "only things found to be illegal are illegal, all the other stuff isn't until such". But i find that argument on the merits fail, because, yesterday i saw someone run a stop sign. Yep didn't stop at all. But, because they were not issued a citation, and that citation that wasn't issued didn't go thru the judicial process, therefore, while the act is illegal, their action was not. That is in some peoples mind.
VHAI - Vocodia Partners with Leading Political Super PACs to Revolutionize Fundraising Efforts • VHAI • Sep 19, 2024 11:48 AM
Dear Cashmere Group Holding Co. AKA Swifty Global Signs Binding Letter of Intent to be Acquired by Signing Day Sports • DRCR • Sep 19, 2024 10:26 AM
HealthLynked Launches Virtual Urgent Care Through Partnership with Lyric Health. • HLYK • Sep 19, 2024 8:00 AM
Element79 Gold Corp. Appoints Kevin Arias as Advisor to the Board of Directors, Strengthening Strategic Leadership • ELMGF • Sep 18, 2024 10:29 AM
Mawson Finland Limited Further Expands the Known Mineralized Zones at Rajapalot: Palokas step-out drills 7 metres @ 9.1 g/t gold & 706 ppm cobalt • MFL • Sep 17, 2024 9:02 AM
PickleJar Announces Integration With OptCulture to Deliver Holistic Fan Experiences at Venue Point of Sale • PKLE • Sep 17, 2024 8:00 AM