Sunday, May 28, 2017 12:40:16 PM
NOW...LETS LAY OUT THE CASE
TWO PARTS
FIRST....FIRST SUIT.....BASED ON THE CONTRACT BETWEEN TAUB & ARYC
SECOND.....DAMAGES
WITH THAT UNDER STANDING
THOUGHT....THE COURT RULED THAT TAUB HAD NO BASIS FOR THE FIRST SUIT
SINCE TAUB HAD NO VALID CONTRACT WITH ARYC
AMEMDEN COMPLIANT......I'M NOT UP TO SPEED
YOUR THOUGHTS
TIA
TOM
VHAI - Vocodia Partners with Leading Political Super PACs to Revolutionize Fundraising Efforts • VHAI • Sep 19, 2024 11:48 AM
Dear Cashmere Group Holding Co. AKA Swifty Global Signs Binding Letter of Intent to be Acquired by Signing Day Sports • DRCR • Sep 19, 2024 10:26 AM
HealthLynked Launches Virtual Urgent Care Through Partnership with Lyric Health. • HLYK • Sep 19, 2024 8:00 AM
Element79 Gold Corp. Appoints Kevin Arias as Advisor to the Board of Directors, Strengthening Strategic Leadership • ELMGF • Sep 18, 2024 10:29 AM
Mawson Finland Limited Further Expands the Known Mineralized Zones at Rajapalot: Palokas step-out drills 7 metres @ 9.1 g/t gold & 706 ppm cobalt • MFL • Sep 17, 2024 9:02 AM
PickleJar Announces Integration With OptCulture to Deliver Holistic Fan Experiences at Venue Point of Sale • PKLE • Sep 17, 2024 8:00 AM