InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,210.52
(
0.44%
)
US TECH 100
17,653.80
(
0.29%
)
Dow Jones
39,378.04
(
0.82%
)
Brent Oil
83.90
(
0.40%
)
Bitcoin
62,269.95
(
1.77%
)
Post# of 34405
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

rickn23

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 52
Posts 9842
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/14/2007

rickn23

Re: PIbecky post# 32786

Saturday, 05/27/2017 11:01:31 AM

Saturday, May 27, 2017 11:01:31 AM

Post# of 34405
I'm not interested in punishing Stan and Gill for transgressions that didn't affect me.

I am interested in getting a fair price for my shares and think the current deal under-values POW!, by a lot.

I'm considering my options. I've considered suing as an individual (not class action). I think actual damages and sufficient punitive damages would be closer to what I could have sold my shares for, if Stan and Gill had not acted badly (after taking out lawyer fees).

I'd consider being part of a class action suit(no work for me).

I think I would be a bad lead plaintiff for a class action lawsuit, depending on what you are suing for. I am curious what your are considering fraudulent.

Edit
If the SEC should impose Rule 13e-3 on POW!, I would just go with that. It should ensure a fair price for POW!

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up