SiNtx Technologies Inc (SINT)

[CL101]

As I said earlier, other companies that have LATE SEC filings on 10K or 10Q, they DON'T use the same language or phrase of "long-lived asset" auditing in their 8-K. Below is the example of JRJR just exactly like the previous example of IMNP:

On 11.15.2016, they filed Form NT 10-Q (non timely to file 10Q)

http://www.jrjrnetworks.com/profiles/investor/secDL.asp?b=2203&c=1403085&ID=000162828016021501/0001628280-16-021501

On 11.29.2016, they filed the 8-K (like the ones amda filed today) explaining the reasons why it was late. In the filing below, can't find the phrase "long-lived asset" auditing like we saw in amda's 8K:

http://www.jrjrnetworks.com/profiles/investor/secDL.asp?b=2203&c=1403085&ID=000162828016021711/0001628280-16-021711

On 3.31.2017, they filed Form NT 10-K (non timely to file 10K)

http://www.jrjrnetworks.com/profiles/investor/secDL.asp?b=2203&c=1403085&ID=000162828017003248/0001628280-17-003248

On 4.20.2017, they filed the 8-K (like the ones amda filed today) explaining the reasons why it was late. I can't find the phrase "long-lived asset" audting as well! Here is the 8K they filed:

http://www.jrjrnetworks.com/profiles/investor/secDL.asp?b=2203&c=1403085&ID=000162828017003963/0001628280-17-003963