InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 184
Posts 33216
Boards Moderated 8
Alias Born 04/14/2010

Re: bigdaddy21c post# 110190

Tuesday, 05/23/2017 7:45:51 PM

Tuesday, May 23, 2017 7:45:51 PM

Post# of 116862
This ones pretty good...

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8fPIL-cKPM-b1JfZEhyQ0lKZGc/view


7. Thereafter, the Blackburn Defendants filed several motions in support, the first of which merely attached Plaintiff’s interrogatory responses with what appeared to be counsel’s handwritten notations indicating which interrogatories were purportedly deficient, although no specific deficiencies were described. The remainder of the document focused on Plaintiff’s trial witness and exhibit lists, which were filed on February 7,3 and which do not relate to the pending discovery motions. No specific request for relief was identified in the motion.
8. The other motions repeat other filings by the Blackburn Defendants, which do not relate to any pending claim or defense, and are therefore superfluous, immaterial, and impertinent and should be striken from the record. These motions essentially argue various conspiracy theories that have nothing at all to do with any pending claim or defense. Doc. 167, wherein Defendants request a hearing on their motion does not even address the subject of the motion, but is instead devoted to an explanation of why defense counsel has no understanding of the case after all this time.
9. Discovery ends today. The Blackburn Defendants have had ten months to explain why Plaintiff’s interrogatory responses are inadequate, and they have failed to do so. The Court gave them another chance—with a 5 page limit—and in the 17 pages they filed in response, they barely even addressed their own motion, apparently leaving it to the Court to decide what was lacking and why, and to divine what relief they might be seeking. [See Doc. 166]10. In short, once again instead of addressing the merits of their own motion, the Blackburn Defendants chose to devote 17 pages to an irrelevant rant which serves only to demonstrate their own failure to understand even the most basic aspects of this case, such as what claims and defenses are pending before the Court.
11. Plaintiff respectfully asks the Court to put a stop to the Blackburn Defendants’ repeated abusive filings (wherein they attack counsel and allege criminal and unprofessional conduct by the SEC without ever citing a single shred of evidence and even though there is no counterclaim or defense in this case about such conduct) and stop counsel’s transparent dilatory tactics, which obviously are being done in an effort to waste time and distract from the real issues in this case—the pervasive fraud perpetrated by the Blackburn Defendants.
12. The Blackburn Defendants have failed to identify a single specific deficiency in Plaintiff’s fulsome discovery responses. Therefore, their motion must fail.



And fail it did... Motion DENIED.

.


Buyer Beware
Red Flags Galore...
Ron Blackburn Scam
Soon To Be Revoked

Grey Market


..

I expose stock scams to gain knowledge about investigating the stock market players and for the entertainment it invariably generates. I've received NO compensation in any form for such, except for a few thank yous...

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.