Tornado Alley (PROG)

[F6]

With Trump Appointees, a Raft of Potential Conflicts and ‘No Transparency’

D. J. Gribbin, an infrastructure specialist on the White House’s National Economic Council, with President Trump this month. Mr. Gribbin used to work for Macquarie, a bank that specializes in infrastructure and stands to gain from such undertakings.
APRIL 15, 2017
WASHINGTON — President Trump is populating the White House and federal agencies with former lobbyists, lawyers and consultants who in many cases are helping to craft new policies for the same industries in which they recently earned a paycheck.
The potential conflicts are arising across the executive branch, according to an analysis of recently released financial disclosures, lobbying records and interviews with current and former ethics officials by The New York Times in collaboration with ProPublica [ https://www.propublica.org/ (their related article blurbed below)].
In at least two cases, the appointments may have already led to violations of the administration’s own ethics rules. But evaluating if and when such violations have occurred has become almost impossible because the Trump administration is secretly issuing waivers to the rules.
One such case involves Michael Catanzaro, who serves as the top White House energy adviser. Until late last year, he was working as a lobbyist [ https://soprweb.senate.gov/index.cfm?event=getFilingDetails&filingID=C5E6F6F9-A752-4C60-892C-6EAEA82FBE6E&filingTypeID=78 ] for major industry clients [ https://soprweb.senate.gov/index.cfm?event=getFilingDetails&filingID=6824FC57-74DD-4E2A-86B5-CF4AA8751581&filingTypeID=78 ] such as Devon Energy of Oklahoma, an oil and gas company, and Talen Energy of Pennsylvania, a coal-burning electric utility, as they fought Obama-era environmental regulations, including the landmark Clean Power Plan. Now, he is handling some of the same matters on behalf of the federal government [ https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2017/02/27/white-house-national-economic-council-director-announces-senior-staff ].
Another case involves Chad Wolf, who spent the past several years lobbying [ https://soprweb.senate.gov/index.cfm?event=getFilingDetails&filingID=D1F2B356-5BF7-4B3A-B640-8453F78AE319&filingTypeID=78 ] to secure funding for the Transportation Security Administration to spend hundreds of millions of dollars on a new carry-on luggage screening device. He is now chief of staff at that agency — at the same time as the device is being tested [ https://www.analogic.com/press-release/analogics-connect-aviation-checkpoint-screening-system-achieves-critical-milestones-on-track-for-tsa-and-international-certification-testing-in-early-2017/ ] and evaluated for possible purchase by agency staff.
There are other examples. At the Labor Department, two officials joined the agency from the K Street lobbying corridor, leaving behind jobs where they fought some of the Obama administration’s signature labor rules, including a policy requiring financial advisers to act in a client’s best interest when providing retirement advice.
This revolving door of lobbyists and government officials is not new in Washington. Both parties make a habit of it.
But the Trump administration is more vulnerable to conflicts than the prior administration, particularly after the president eliminated an ethics provision that prohibits lobbyists from joining agencies they lobbied in the prior two years. The White House also announced on Friday that it would keep its visitors’ logs secret [ https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/14/us/politics/visitor-log-white-house-trump.html ], discontinuing the release of information on corporate executives, lobbyists and others who enter the complex, often to try to influence federal policy. The changes have drawn intense criticism from government ethics advocates across the city.
Mr. Trump’s appointees are also far wealthier and have more complex financial holdings and private-sector ties than officials hired at the start of the Obama administration, according to an Office of Government Ethics analysis [ https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3670698-Trump-vs-Obama-Financial-Complexity-of-Nominees.html ] that the White House has made public. This creates a greater chance that they might have conflicts related to investments or former clients, which could force them to sell off assets, recuse themselves or seek a waiver.
A White House spokeswoman, Sarah H. Sanders, declined repeated requests by The Times to speak with Stefan C. Passantino, the White House lawyer [ https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2017/01/25/president-donald-j-trump-announces-white-house-compliance-team ] in charge of the ethics policy. Instead, the White House provided a written statement that did not address any of the specific questions about potential violations The Times had identified.
“The White House takes its ethics pledge and federal conflict of interest rules very seriously,” the statement said. “The White House requires all of its employees to work closely with ethics counsel to ensure compliance and has aggressively required employees to recuse or divest where the law requires.”
The Trump administration’s overhaul of personnel lays the groundwork for sweeping policy changes. The president has vowed to unwind some of the Obama administration’s signature regulatory initiatives, from Wall Street rules to environmental regulations, and he has installed a class of former corporate influencers to lead the push. ...
[...]
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/15/us/politics/trump-appointees-potential-conflicts.html [with comments]


*


Trump is Hiring Lobbyists and Top Ethics Official Says ‘There’s No Transparency’
In one case, an official working on energy regulation recently lobbied for oil and coal companies — but the White House won’t say whether he received an ethics waiver.
April 15, 2017
President Trump [ https://www.propublica.org/trump-administration , https://www.propublica.org/article/the-white-house-still-hasnt-released-most-staffers-financial-disclosures ] has stocked his administration with a small army of former lobbyists and corporate consultants who are now in the vanguard of the effort to roll back government regulations at the agencies they once sought to influence, according to an analysis of government records by the New York Times in collaboration with ProPublica.
The Times adds new details to our previous reporting on Trump’s weakening of ethics rules [ https://www.propublica.org/article/trump-watered-down-ethics-rules-let-lobbyist-help-run-agency-he-lobbied ] and former lobbyists working on regulations they opposed on behalf of private clients just months ago [ https://www.propublica.org/article/how-the-trump-administration-may-be-skirting-its-own-ethics-rules ].
[...]
https://www.propublica.org/article/trump-hiring-lobbyists-top-ethics-official-says-no-transparency [with comments]


--


in addition to (linked in) the post to which this is a reply and preceding and (other) following, see also (linked in):

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=130899999 and preceding and following

elsewhere this string, http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=130928885 and preceding (and any future following)