Anavex Life Sciences Corp (AVXL)

[ExtremelyBullishZig]

I have finally found the section from the USPTO that confirms what we have been saying in easy to understand language.

"1302.14   Reasons for Allowance [R-07.2015]

37 CFR 1.104  Nature of examination.

*****

(e) Reasons for allowance. If the examiner believes that the record of the prosecution as a whole does not make clear his or her reasons for allowing a claim or claims, the examiner may set forth such reasoning. The reasons shall be incorporated into an Office action rejecting other claims of the application or patent under reexamination or be the subject of a separate communication to the applicant or patent owner. The applicant or patent owner may file a statement commenting on the reasons for allowance within such time as may be specified by the examiner. Failure by the examiner to respond to any statement commenting on reasons for allowance does not give rise to any implication."

https://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/s1302.html

Basically...there are claims that are good enough for allowance. Due to the number of back and forth/removed and added claims...the examiner clarifies by documenting which claims are good. They become the reasons for the allowance.