InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 72
Posts 100701
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 08/01/2006

Re: JimLur post# 268580

Thursday, 04/27/2017 6:15:26 PM

Thursday, April 27, 2017 6:15:26 PM

Post# of 480711
JimLur, recycling of the long since discredited claims against Planned Parenthood and their moral and lawful practice re fetal tissue used for stem
cell research will no longer be tolerated .. i'll leave that one for F6 to decide on this time .. any of similar stench i see in the future will be deleted.

Unspinning the Planned Parenthood Video

By Dave Levitan
Posted on July 21, 2015

[...]

We also asked experts in the use of human tissue for research about the potential for profit. Sherilyn J. Sawyer, the director of Harvard University and Brigham and Women’s Hospital’s “biorepository,” told us that “there’s no way there’s a profit at that price.” She continued in an email:

-
Sawyer, July 20: In reality, $30-100 probably constitutes a loss for [Planned Parenthood]. The costs associated with collection, processing, storage, and inventory and records management for specimens are very high. Most hospitals will provide tissue blocks from surgical procedures (ones no longer needed for clinical purposes, and without identity) for research, and cost recover for their time and effort in the range of $100-500 per case/block. In the realm of tissues for research $30-100 is completely reasonable and normal fee.
-

[...]

On July 21, the Center for Medical Progress released a second, similar video, again featuring a discussion with a Planned Parenthood official in a restaurant. The numbers mentioned in the edited video are similar to what Nucatola said. The official, Mary Gatter, quotes a rate of $75 per specimen, and says she was thinking of saying $50. The discussion only reaches $100 because the “buyers” in the video mention higher prices. At one point, Gatter says that “we’re not in this for the money,” and later she reiterates that “money is not the important thing.”

Though few studies of costs associated with fetal tissue acquisition are available, existing evidence does suggest the prices named in the video are in line with general practices. The National Institutes of Health conducts research with fetal tissue, and in the late 1990s, the Government Accountability Office (then known as the General Accounting Office) looked into the acquisition of such tissue, finding that the direct cost to researchers was “low.” GAO said payments primarily went to “central tissue suppliers,” as opposed to health clinics. In most cases, GAO found that clinics did not charge researchers, but when they did, the cost ranged from $2 to $75. The report did not address how much clinics might have received from central tissue suppliers, which is more analogous to the situation presented in the video.

http://www.factcheck.org/2015/07/unspinning-the-planned-parenthood-video/

Too much from Breitbart is venal shit, the stench of the site is such
that it could almost be considered for inclusion in the banned sites list .. fyi ..
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=130846496



It was Plato who said, “He, O men, is the wisest, who like Socrates, knows that his wisdom is in truth worth nothing”

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.