Thursday, April 27, 2017 3:16:47 AM
There seems to be a lot of confusion about the Attia claim. I'm pro Attia. He was definitely a contractor though, as 15 minutes of research reveals, and his claim includes breach of contract not patent infringement.
It may go well for him. Too bad the contingency fee is so high. Why does MaxD get a piece?
I'm not at all clear on what a right to a licensing agreement means here. But I'm sure some sage can explain it.
Regardless,I think a lot of people would support Attia's plight here and think he likely deserves compensation beyond that which was paid under his contract.
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM